Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator ZeroPak


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 41
Like Tree34Likes

Thread: ideal barrel length for 223, is there a formula?

  1. #16
    Member Beavis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    4,834
    In my personal experiance, a 14.5" barrel with a book max load under a 55gr projectile will yield approx 2800fps. A 16" with the same load will gain 50fps. A 20" barrel will gaim another 50-100fps.

  2. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    north otago
    Posts
    322
    thanks for the info guys

  3. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    170
    Threads that keep on giving

  4. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Orewa, Auckland
    Posts
    25
    Theres a very good study by the Swedish Police on this topic. It's on the web somewhere, I'll try to find a link.

  5. #20
    Member Cordite's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    NZ Mainland (Dunedin)
    Posts
    5,478
    I have heard it said longer barrels have lower ES, possibly due to more complete powder burn. I don't have a reference for it.

    If it would give a practical advantage is questionable since longer barrels are also expected to be whippy and a long heavy barrel profile means poor balance, but then again everyone uses bipods.
    An itch ... is ... a desire to scratch

  6. #21
    Member Rock river arms hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    2,100
    This post is bringing up good memories for me.

    I had a 20"

    Sold it albeit it was a semi varmint profile barrel.

    Next time I went for a 16" as a all-rounder for hunting, 3 gun and yeeting with having a great time.

    I found 16 was hands down the most practical.

    Using irons ringing steel at 270y was stupidly easy.

    The thing for a 223 I think I'd actually be more concerned with would be twist rate.
    @Beavis will be able to offer more insight on the subject than I but I found 1 in 8 was a good all-round twist rate.

    Hope this info helps

  7. #22
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    8,886
    Quote Originally Posted by Cordite View Post
    I have heard it said longer barrels have lower ES, possibly due to more complete powder burn. I don't have a reference for it.

    If it would give a practical advantage is questionable since longer barrels are also expected to be whippy and a long heavy barrel profile means poor balance, but then again everyone uses bipods.
    Longer than what? My load in my 18" rifle has a 1.7fps SD so rifles with shorter than traditional barrels certainly don't struggle to have good ED/SD.
    25 /08 IMP, Micky Duck and Cordite like this.

  8. #23
    Member Beavis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    4,834
    Quote Originally Posted by Rock river arms hunter View Post
    This post is bringing up good memories for me.

    I had a 20"

    Sold it albeit it was a semi varmint profile barrel.

    Next time I went for a 16" as a all-rounder for hunting, 3 gun and yeeting with having a great time.

    I found 16 was hands down the most practical.

    Using irons ringing steel at 270y was stupidly easy.

    The thing for a 223 I think I'd actually be more concerned with would be twist rate.
    @Beavis will be able to offer more insight on the subject than I but I found 1 in 8 was a good all-round twist rate.

    Hope this info helps
    If I built a bolt gun today in 223, I want a 1:7, maybe even a 1:6.5 twist. I wouldn't mind having a play with some of the 90-95gr bullets.

    I'm currently running a 17" barrel on my GBC straight pull rifle and getting 2700fps with 75gr Gold Dots. I can load it hotter, could probably push it to 2800, but getting ok accuracy and using less powder where I am. This load really takes 223 to another place firepower wise.
    Micky Duck likes this.

  9. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    213
    Just out of interest, would the barrel length make a difference for a bolt gun vs semi auto regarding velocity?

  10. #25
    Member Beavis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    4,834
    Quote Originally Posted by JaSa View Post
    Just out of interest, would the barrel length make a difference for a bolt gun vs semi auto regarding velocity?
    Literally no difference. The difference will be between barrel idiosyncrasies. Some barrels are faster than others, some barrels take a couple hundred rounds to foul up and then will jump in velocity.
    JaSa likes this.

  11. #26
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    8,886
    A bit academic these days anyway.
    Micky Duck likes this.

  12. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Waiuku
    Posts
    786
    Quote Originally Posted by Beavis View Post
    If I built a bolt gun today in 223, I want a 1:7, maybe even a 1:6.5 twist. I wouldn't mind having a play with some of the 90-95gr bullets.

    I'm currently running a 17" barrel on my GBC straight pull rifle and getting 2700fps with 75gr Gold Dots. I can load it hotter, could probably push it to 2800, but getting ok accuracy and using less powder where I am. This load really takes 223 to another place firepower wise.
    With no semi options these days and most bolt actions like the Tikka's not sized to the 223 case at what projectile weight would it be more logical to just buy a 243 and be done with it. I ask as 90-95g bullets seem to be 243 territory.
    Full disclosure I do not own a 223 or 243, just an interested observer.
    Micky Duck likes this.

  13. #28
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    353
    I'll break out the defib on this one. Is a 16" or 18" 223 with a suppressor going to have any issues shooting factory ammo? Cheers

  14. #29
    Member 300CALMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    NZISTAN
    Posts
    5,215
    Quote Originally Posted by hamishg View Post
    I'll break out the defib on this one. Is a 16" or 18" 223 with a suppressor going to have any issues shooting factory ammo? Cheers
    HAHA about the defib but no, I don't see why it would.

  15. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    353
    Cheers 300cal. Wouldn't foul the suppressor faster or anything? Any advantage going 18 over 16 other than a few fps?

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. .243 Barrel length, over barrel or forward mount suppressor
    By Strider B in forum Projects and Home Builds
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 14-04-2018, 01:52 PM
  2. Minimum legal barrel length and overall length for firearms
    By A.J.P. in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 27-07-2015, 12:30 PM
  3. 7 Rem Mag - barrel length
    By Gibo in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 24-06-2015, 02:27 PM
  4. best barrel length for a .308 ?
    By dale in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 12-08-2014, 08:26 AM
  5. 308 barrel length
    By Hunty1 in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 12-10-2013, 08:24 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!