Thread: Shooting: The sport all of us enjoy - do your part in preserving the ability to do so

Yep here here

According to the labour party face book page it is National and the Maori party that are making these new laws not Mr Nash!

LoL "paws".

'Old school' hunter praises police inquiry into semi-automatc firearms | Stuff.co.nz

Be very very quiet. I'm hunting wabbits.

Originally Posted by Ryan

LoL "paws".

Wait till they classify double barrels as restricted due to the number of sawn offs in criminal hands.

Originally Posted by Mauser308

More correctly, it's a sad fact in this country that so many Kiwi's abuse others and the majority turn a blind eye. Psychological abuse, child abuse, bullying, violence, it's just a factor of strength I think that the majority of damage is perpetrated by males IMO. The numbers of women twisting the legal system in cases of seperation, or using controlling behaviours towards their ex by threatening to report for abuse of the children is a serious and growing issue. I actually suspect it's a systemic issue with the social policy system, if you get a chance to talk shop with a social worker get them to give their trained opinion on domestic violence. They are invariably conditioned to refer to the female as the victim and the male as the offender or the abuser, it's how they are trained. Until we sort that systemic ignorance of the real issues out we are not going to sort the problem out.

This is not something I have turned my mind to previously, however I saw this last weekend. Witnessed a car pull up, male and female got out. Female was screaming at the male got right up to him and then grabbed his face with one hand, the guy pushes her away and starts walking away, female followed him and punches him in the back of the head and this happens a few more times. They see me approahing them and my wife on the phone and the female gets back in the car and drives off. I talk to the guy and he seems ok. My wife was talking to the police call centre and the odd thing was that they were taking far more interest in what he was doing "is following her?", "did he push her to the ground?" "Has he hit her" "whats he doing now" even asked for his description and the description of his car (that she drove off in) before asking for a descrition of her.

While I understand that they were confirming his actions in case of a he says she says but my wife said it felt like an uphill battle to get across that she was attacking him and he was trying to walkaway.

Originally Posted by Pineapple

This is not something I have turned my mind to previously, however I saw this last weekend. Witnessed a car pull up, male and female got out. Female was screaming at the male got right up to him and then grabbed his face with one hand, the guy pushes her away and starts walking away, female followed him and punches him in the back of the head and this happens a few more times. They see me approahing them and my wife on the phone and the female gets back in the car and drives off. I talk to the guy and he seems ok. My wife was talking to the police call centre and the odd thing was that they were taking far more interest in what he was doing "is following her?", "did he push her to the ground?" "Has he hit her" "whats he doing now" even asked for his description and the description of his car (that she drove off in) before asking for a descrition of her.

While I understand that they were confirming his actions in case of a he says she says but my wife said it felt like an uphill battle to get across that she was attacking him and he was trying to walkaway.

It is always they guys fault when dealing with the police/justice system. My friend has been threw absolute hell because he impregnated a crazy woman, finally it looks like he will get full custody after she has spent 6 years screwing up a young boy.

Originally Posted by veitnamcam

It is always they guys fault when dealing with the police/justice system. My friend has been threw absolute hell because he impregnated a crazy woman, finally it looks like he will get full custody after she has spent 6 years screwing up a young boy.

Try applying for child support as a male and see how they treat you. Takes sometime for them to understand you are not a male trying to slide out of paying but just want some of your tax paying money taken off their bludging benefit 😀 (I have fully custody) , the money amount is nominal, less than a packet of cigarettes a week but a fun exercise never the less .

Back to the topic of thread

Looking right back to the Heather Du Plessis Allan staged stunt and where this was likely driven from. This has been a well planned political agenda by a certain association and organization.

Dirty politics of misinformation, lying to public through main stream media, secret submissions it certainly hasn't happened overnight with a clearly driven objective from the people driving it.

Personally I think they have miscalculated as although they managed to get through simular laws on the back of an unfortunate mass killing in their previous home country. They might have tried to take to big a bite of changing the laws in this country in the same way due to arrogance and not understanding much of our history and culture.

Either way next election will probably spell it out where all hunting and shooting sports will end up in future for NZ.

Labour/Green coalition will see it gradually become quite difficult due to mass beuractic paperwork(their tool)to own and participate in shooting and hunting sports and drive towards United Nations disarm citizens framework

Right/Centre coalition will see a backlash from public and massive growth in all shooting sports in New Zealand due to publicity from campaign to restrict.
Laws will be addressed in consultation with stakeholders and some sensible revamps to act updated that actually achieve something. Largely a continuation of NZ's successful focus on who should and shouldn't person basis of Arms act. Rather than endless regulations that achieve nothing.

It was interesting at the meeting. Try as I might, I couldn't get Nash to say that registration was a waste of time. He acknowledged that it won't stop guns getting into the hands of criminals. He acknowledged that it was a failure in Canada, and it doesn't stop criminals in Australia getting firearms. He ackowledged that police here, don't have the resources or the technology to implement it effectively. But, he still said "but what if we can get the technology?".

He's only just trying to get through the next election and have a job.
He thought he was on a cake run chairing that select committee sucking up whatever the Police told them and would pass through into law piece of piss on the quiet with the masses saying "here, here, ban the guns etc..".
Will be regretting it now, as he might have got away with it in say a central Auckland or Wellington Electorate. Napier being quite rural something like this seems to have the ability to focus away from what might be more important electoral issues.

Staggering they spent that much time on the Select Committee and to have such little understanding of the law(genuinely, not like Cahill who just lies).
He should have talked more to his "shooting mates" while ignoring all other stakeholders submissions.

Originally Posted by Beavis

It was interesting at the meeting. Try as I might, I couldn't get Nash to say that registration was a waste of time. He acknowledged that it won't stop guns getting into the hands of criminals. He acknowledged that it was a failure in Canada, and it doesn't stop criminals in Australia getting firearms. He ackowledged that police here, don't have the resources or the technology to implement it effectively. But, he still said "but what if we can get the technology?".

I wonder what technology Stuart means? Computers maybe? I am sure Canada had some of them when they tried and failed in the registration game.

Originally Posted by Krameranzac

I wonder what technology Stuart means? Computers maybe? I am sure Canada had some of them when they tried and failed in the registration game.

you cpuld have HAL 9000 at your disposal it wont make a difference if people dont comply. the best firearms security you can have is people not knowing what you have

Originally Posted by gonetropo

you cpuld have HAL 9000 at your disposal it wont make a difference if people dont comply. the best firearms security you can have is people not knowing what you have

Probably don't even need non compliance for it to be worthless, just look at some of our other government led computer/software systems. Novopay and INCIS come to mind.

Originally Posted by gonetropo

you cpuld have HAL 9000 at your disposal it wont make a difference if people dont comply. the best firearms security you can have is people not knowing what you have

Given what HAL does in the film, that may not be a good example