Search:

good, thank you

I am saying that "Science" that only regards data that verifies one set narrative, and disregards the reat isn't science.

I prefer facts I and other people see on the ground instead of "reports" written by what nowadays can only be classified as ideologues.

disagree.

I have personally heard certain "advocates" for "conservation" publicly express the idea of using genetically engineered viruses to (quote) "eradicate" pests.

Not every player in this "game" is...

Also being nzda members reduces the risk of there being "fuckwits". And there is insurance.

Win-Win for every party.

Those who want to achieve something find ways those who do not find reasons...

All these "problems" could be solved or at least mitigated if there was a will. Instead some actors choose to whinge...

Please keep your projections to your self, and also understand that my remark was not necessarily aimed directly at you, each and every one will have their reasons, some of them even good reasons.
...

Totally understand where you are coming from.

However If one choses to believe the "there are too many deer" narrative there essentially are 2 options: share the spots with "too many deer" and...

Always cracks me up how people boast seeing "too many" deer in their "secret spot".

Plenty of new and young hunters that would be keen if somebody showed them those "secret spots" of yours.