Search:

Absolutely it works. And saves your ears at the same time.

That one you speak of is at Gunworks getting a noise sharing device added at the moment. I thought it would be good to get one and share...

No, the volume is constant (the container) but the pressure would reduce. PV = nRT. That is why the gases limp out of the suppressor. I would say the pressure would drop a lot. Compare the mass of...

Though, because the gases cool in the suppressor, some of the kinetic energy is turned into heat energy and dissipated. This is why an attached suppressor is not an entirely closed system.

You cannot change the speed in that in that equation as c is the constant speed of light and that is the equation that started the whole theory of relativity.



You use the conservation of...

100% correct. As stated it is a closed system.

You must look at it from an external point of view in order to make sense as I stated earlier. The reduction in recoil from a suppressor can only...

Gottcha! Yup, that is a "crock of shit" as they say because it is a closed system. Apologies Puffin, you are very correct on that.

No. It is simple physics. It will be acting as an effective brake, not as well as a muzzle brake, but with a typical 1/3 reduction (most rounds seem to have a powder load around half of the...

You are not at all correct there. Anything that slows the forward release of gas will act as a brake. By having a suppressor with substantially greater volume than the barrel will greatly reduce the...

And the suppressor holds a lot of heat and slows down the rate the barrel can cool, so you need to shoot a lot slower. I can see advantages and disadvantages in both. A matter of choosing what suits...