Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT Darkness


User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 41
Like Tree41Likes

Thread: Case lengthening when bump sizing

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    Yorkshire/England
    Posts
    77

    Case lengthening when bump sizing

    Before I launch into this , I'd first like to apologise to @knightshade for derailing his thread with this topic. Sorry .

    I'd also like to say that this thread is in no way meant to be preachy or argumentative , ust for discussion .I'll try to get the tone right .

    Okay, so this seems to be a relatively common phenomena and the question has appeared a few times of recent on the Stalking Directory forum over here in the UK . The question usually arising after f/l resized fired formed brass won't chamber . I think the question is becoming more regular as more people seem to be trying to just push the shoulder back a couple of thou" .

    So here's my and other people on the SD's understanding .

    A full length sizing die sizes in the following order , outside neck diameter, body/web , shoulder then finally inside neck diameter . The lengthening occurs when the body has started to be size before the shoulder engages the die, think squeezing a ball or balloon , it gets thinner but longer . Now anyone who thinks the body doesn't get sized would be mistaken , if that were the case no one would ever encounter a stuck case due to lack of lube .

    To give some weight to this , I stumbled on this after a rebarrel and purchase of new Hornady dies . I use Redding competition shellholders , they're easy to setup, give consistent results and I'm a bit lazy.

    I started with the 0.010 " shellholder and the cases became difficult to chamber and measurement with the comparator saw an increase in length of about 0.002" . The 0.008" saw no measurable difference and chambered fine . The 0.006" resulted in a shoulder setback of 0.001-0.002" shoulder set back , which was my target . These figures are from memory as I didn't think I'd ever need them . I should have perhaps taken note of the effect on the case length by measuring head to neck .



    I should add that I had been made aware of this but wasn't looking for it , I was just setting up a die and spring back was unlikely as I anneal .

    This isn't an attempt to teach others to suck eggs , more a question of other people's thoughts and observations?

    Regards all

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Is "case sizing" a requirement when reloading 12 gauge hulls ?
    By Kiwi Sapper in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 27-05-2021, 10:34 PM
  2. 577/450 case sizing
    By BMcB in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-10-2020, 05:25 PM
  3. Case Sizing Dramas
    By rossm-96 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 17-01-2020, 12:43 AM
  4. Case neck sizing and effect on accuracy
    By Puffin in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 30-03-2018, 08:09 AM
  5. Case sizing and O.A.L
    By Grunta in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 30-09-2012, 12:18 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!