Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 98
Like Tree32Likes

Thread: Powder for 6.5 06 and 140gr projectile

  1. #46
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    22,589
    funny thing with magnum primers...about HALF of the loading manuals etc will say to use it with the likes of 2213....the other half say std.
    I bought a thousand magnum primers cheaply so thats what I use for everything except subs.

  2. #47
    Member Mathias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Canterbury, home of the big Rakaia Red Stag
    Posts
    4,272
    With RL26 and the 06 case size, I'd recommend the Federal 215M as the fire starter.

  3. #48
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Invervegas
    Posts
    4,555
    Hmmm - I don't know that I'd buy a can of RL-26 just to "gain something" but if nothing else would shoot it might be worth a try . .

    Cartridge : 6.5-06 A-Square
    Bullet : .264, 140, Hornady A-MAX 26332
    Useable Case Capaci: 61.183 grain H2O = 3.973 cm³
    Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.340 inch = 84.84 mm
    Barrel Length : 23.5 inch = 596.9 mm
    Powder : Alliant Reloder-26

    Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
    incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
    CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

    Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
    % % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

    -20.0 77 46.40 2391 1777 29704 11476 95.9 1.635
    -18.0 78 47.56 2454 1873 31842 11802 97.0 1.592
    -16.0 80 48.72 2518 1971 34145 12102 97.9 1.549
    -14.0 82 49.88 2581 2071 36626 12374 98.7 1.508
    -12.0 84 51.04 2644 2174 39304 12616 99.3 1.461
    -10.0 86 52.20 2707 2278 42184 12825 99.7 1.412
    -08.0 88 53.36 2769 2384 45309 13001 99.9 1.366
    -06.0 90 54.52 2831 2491 48685 13141 100.0 1.321
    -04.0 92 55.68 2892 2600 52283 13264 100.0 1.279
    -02.0 94 56.84 2952 2710 56136 13383 100.0 1.238 ! Near Maximum !
    +00.0 96 58.00 3012 2820 60273 13498 100.0 1.198 ! Near Maximum !
    +02.0 98 59.16 3071 2932 64718 13608 100.0 1.160 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

  4. #49
    Caretaker - Gone But Not Forgotten jakewire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    here
    Posts
    7,477
    Does anyone think that I should go higher with the 4831 first
    as I said I maxed at book max [Hornady] at 49.4 for very slow but above [ Thanks Tentman] Q/L is telling me 55gn is OK
    I'd work up naturally but it is a heck of a leap.
    @Mathias, I use 210M, so 215 is that the magnum primer?
    Micky Duck likes this.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

  5. #50
    Member Mathias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Canterbury, home of the big Rakaia Red Stag
    Posts
    4,272
    Yep magnum primer.

    Sent from my SM-A530F using Tapatalk

  6. #51
    Member Puffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    973
    Quote Originally Posted by jakewire View Post
    Does anyone think that I should go higher with the 4831...
    Your measured velocities seem to be in line with the QL predictions Tentman put up on the 3rd for 140gr bullets with 2213sc/H4831sc. The concern if I understand correctly was more that the readings were jumping around as you went up in small charge increments rather than any reason to believe that the peak pressures were anything other than very mild?
    Appropriate burn-rate double-based powders (N560, Re-22, Re-26 etc.) would give you an extra 50-100ft/sec over 2213sc, but given the accuracy potential of 2213sc in your rifle I would be carrying on with development up into the 2850-3000ft/sec range, while looking for a combination of accuracy and lower ES.
    jakewire likes this.

  7. #52
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Invervegas
    Posts
    4,555
    Who chambered your rifle and what sort of throat did they give it?? (I never looked at your velocity results till just now) as it sounds like you may have a long freebore. Have you tried seating a bullet out to the lands . . . if so what length did you get??

  8. #53
    Member Puffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    973
    Quote Originally Posted by jakewire View Post
    The whole range didn't have a bullet hole separating them top to bottom each one broke the hole below it.

  9. #54
    Caretaker - Gone But Not Forgotten jakewire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    here
    Posts
    7,477
    Chambered At Waitaki engineering
    I have no qualms whatsoever about the rifle
    As @Puffin has said the Loads apart from the last were inline with the Load you put up @Tentman, I was /am just a it weary, more than a bit, of going over book max by 6 odd gn to achieve that. @Tentman I seated at 3.33
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

  10. #55
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    22,589
    keep going up slowly...watching for bolt lift issues or marks on brass or flatterned primers..... only YOU will know when you think its getting hot...or drop projectile weight to gain speed.LOL

  11. #56
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Invervegas
    Posts
    4,555
    Well if Mark did the chambering it will be RIGHT, i.e. done precisely and correctly. However its still usefull to know how much freebore it has, he'll know how he throated it even if he didn't discuss it with you . . .

  12. #57
    Caretaker - Gone But Not Forgotten jakewire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    here
    Posts
    7,477
    Ok, I'll ask him tonight about the free bore, and I'll go up in single loads At 1/2 a grain each looking a speed and for signs of pressure.
    Micky Duck likes this.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

  13. #58
    northdude
    Guest
    how are you getting on with this project

  14. #59
    northdude
    Guest
    hows this project coming along

  15. #60
    Caretaker - Gone But Not Forgotten jakewire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    here
    Posts
    7,477
    Funny you should bring this up I was just getting stuff sorted from a day out

    I friend gave me some AR2225 to try but I couldn't find much data so left it for today just upped the H4831 and along side used a Magnum primer

    Results were, all 4831, remember Hornady book max was 49.4 but Tentmans Q/L gave me at least a 55Gn window


    Frederal Match 210 CCI Magnum
    51gn - 2600 2663
    52gn - 2630 2678
    53gn - 2706 2753
    54gn - 2782 2823
    55gn - 2830 2865

    So we started off about 60FPS faster using the Magnum, but as the charge got bigger the gap closes till after 5 gns up it is half almost what it was.
    I still think there is easily another grain in the Load maybe as there were no visible signs of pressure and no felt signs either.
    Cheers.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. 16" 308 mid weight projectile powder
    By Hunty1 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 19-07-2018, 09:39 PM
  2. Powder of choice for 140gr in 6.5x55??
    By LJP in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 21-07-2014, 08:23 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!