Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
Like Tree22Likes

Thread: Published vs actual load variations.

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    263

    Published vs actual load variations.

    So I may have opened Pandora's Box by getting a hold of a chronograph.

    I set myself up for an OCW test this morning and went out with loads for my 7mm Rem Mag. Powder is H4831SC and bullet is 162gr ELD-X over CCI mag primers and Norma brass. Rifle is a T3 with 23.5" barrel and T2 brake.

    I ran a couple of shots through to ensure I was on target for testing and to get the chrony set up and ensure it was working.

    Started with a load at 62gr and went up to 65gr which is 1gr over advertised max load in Hodgdon data. Hodgdon suggests that a similar rifle should be producing 2731FPS with 60gr of powder; I'm getting 2550FPS with 62gr. Moving to the max side, at 64gr Hodgdon reckons I should see around 2870FPS and I'm getting just shy of 2800 with 65gr of powder which is over max recommended load. I see no pressure signs at all on the 65gr cases.

    Anyone else see deviations like this? Anything I should be looking for?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Kapiti Coast
    Posts
    1,003
    They normally specify the barrel length, twist etc that the load was created for. How different is your configuration from their benchmark configuration?

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    263
    My barrel is 1/2" shorter with a brake. Other than that the rifling is the same, 1:9.5.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Quakechurch
    Posts
    1,737
    Barrels vary in speed. Ammunition producers are mostly optimistic. Never seen faster results coming out of my rifles than shown on the box. 100-200fps isn't surprising to me.

    So far as reloading is concerned, there is always variation there as well...
    tetawa likes this.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    263
    Cheers, I can take a bit of speed discrepancy here and there. Just looking for thoughts on loading over max advertised load and still about 100fps off of advertised velocity. Like I noted above, I'm seeing no pressure signs at all and when I loaded to 65gr I went up a node and had 3 rounds touching. Thinks I'll have a play and work my way up in 0.5 gr increments until I see some pressure signs.
    WallyR likes this.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Tokoroa
    Posts
    1,221
    You can get quite different velocities from rifle to rifle, I had two 6mmBR rifles same action same barrel maker match chambers with different reamers,
    Same load one rifle was 50 fps faster than the other accuracy was the same so was the SD and ES shot both out to 1000 yrds both would shoot possibles
    Don't worry about it try some different powders you may find one that gives better performance
    Tommy and Micky Duck like this.

  7. #7
    Caretaker - Gone But Not Forgotten jakewire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    here
    Posts
    7,477
    All Chronographs aren't created equal either, some times shields on/off can make quite a difference.
    Best thing it to shoot , chrony ,make a chart using the Bc and obtained average speed , and the Bc of the 162gr Hornady has probably been examined closely and won't be far off ,then shoot out in stages out past a least 500yrs, more if you can at a big target and note where the bullet lands each time, this will tell you whether you have speed discrepancies .
    you can then fiddle with the speed/ Bc in a program untill they match, it's not quite as simple as that but you'll see what I mean.
    BRADS and Gibo like this.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Rolleston
    Posts
    559
    It does seem a little on the slow side - my 7x64 runs at similar pace, but as long as it shoots ok it’s likely plenty fast enough. A 162gr flies a fair way with those sort of numbers...

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    3,915
    I run 162 gr A-Max in my 7 mm Mag and 65grs of AR2213 SC for 2955 fps in a standard Rem 24 inch barrel. Looks as if your load of 64grs at 2800 Fps is ok and 65 grs should be at 2850- 2870 fps which in a 23.5 inch barrel is good. As stated already rifles even of the same type and barrel length can shoot 100- 200 fps slower and in some cases faster.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    3,915
    AR 2217 might be worth a try if you want a bit more speed, worth a try.

  11. #11
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,766
    This is how I roll for any rifle in any caliber for non subsonic ammo.

    1 Load up from minimum data or if there is no data for the chambering use some common sense from similar chamberings data....-08 06 size cases 1 grain steps are good,223 or smaller 1 grain steps are way to big go 0.2gr.

    Seated at max mag length or just touching the lands(for a hunting rifle) load one shot from min to a good 3-4gr over max....fire each wearing safety glasses of course taking particular note of recoil and force required to lift the bolt and retract the bolt and any stamping/shaving of brass from the case head.
    The point at which you find very stiff bolt lift/stamping on the case head being shaved off is over maximum! dont fire anymore !
    Back off a grain at least from here(in a 08/06 sized case) and thats max.
    Now you know where maximum is and it only cost you 4-7 shots and you can load a few at various charges around and under max to test for accuracy.
    wsm junkie, 199p, mikee and 2 others like this.
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Kingcountry
    Posts
    4,624
    I have ADI reloading books going back to the days of "NOAH" the max charges have dropped off by 5-10% with some cartridges since the early loads. Now use their max load as starting load and never had a problem.
    Ackley, Gibo and Micky Duck like this.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Invercargill
    Posts
    1,769
    Just consider temperature when developing a load, if you go close or above maximum in an average temperature day it may be "hot" load when the temperature goes up… Been reloading for 7mm Rem Mag for a bit and learned that fast burning rates are better with light projectiles, try slower burn rates with the 162gr+ projectiles, Hodgdon H1000, retumbo, ADI2217 or ADI2225, i average about 3100 out of a 24" barrel without compromise.
    I hope it helps a bit…

    Mac

  14. #14
    Sending it Gibo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    The Hill
    Posts
    23,208
    My chrony can be +- 70 fps. So don't get to hung up on it until you have validated the speed as per Jakewires post.
    veitnamcam and BRADS like this.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Invercargill
    Posts
    1,769
    In this photo you can see 4 different chronographs that was shifted in positions (excepted the magbetospeed) for velocity comparison, they are 2X ProChrono, one CED thing and the magnetospeed, velocity variation was about 50ft/s if I am correct. @greghud may confirm the results.

    Cheers

    Mac

    Name:  FF5B789C-14FD-44C1-980B-3F9994944479.jpeg
Views: 364
Size:  1.49 MB
    Gibo and Boaraxa like this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Cartridge name vs actual size
    By Tombi in forum Shooting
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 24-04-2017, 03:14 PM
  2. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 23-01-2016, 08:28 PM
  3. Actual drops - speed calc
    By ebf in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-11-2014, 11:34 AM
  4. 22-250 load help
    By Neckshot in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 19-07-2014, 07:58 PM
  5. What is the actual process for sending a firearm
    By Bill999 in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 04-10-2013, 10:59 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!