Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Alpine Darkness


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
Like Tree17Likes

Thread: Redding S Type Match Dies - Bushing or not?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Loburn, Canterbury
    Posts
    398

    Redding S Type Match Dies - Bushing or not?

    Hi all,

    I have S-type match dies for my 6.5-284. I ran a bushing in the sizing die and all cases were neck turned for a tight chamber.

    I had the chamber re-cut for a standard neck.

    Question I have, do I need to run a bushing in my sizing die?

    I have loaded some rounds without and hasn’t been a problem, however, it doesn’t stack up in my mind sizing without a bushing.

    Thanks for any feedback

  2. #2
    Lovin Facebook for hunters kiwijames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    7,108
    You cannot neck size without a bushing. Type-S need one or its just a huge hole. I suspect you have loaded your old tight neck brass and have minimal neck tension now.
    If your chamber was tight, then opened up, the bushing you had will still give the same neck tension if you're using the same brass. The variable changed was the chamber not the components.
    Do you know how to measure neck tension? Try that first and should point you in the right direction.
    Puffin and zimmer like this.
    The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice. And because we fail to notice that we fail to notice, there is little we can do to change; until we notice how failing to notice shapes our thoughts and deeds

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    449
    Yes I believe so, although your new loaded neck diameter will more than likely need a new bushing size?

    Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
    Ubique.
    Once divided, always conquered.

  4. #4
    Member Puffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    974
    Quote Originally Posted by Gerardo View Post
    Yes I believe so, although your new loaded neck diameter will more than likely need a new bushing size?
    No, not this - not the bit about needing a different size of bushing. As James has said, if you are using the same neck-turned brass, then all that will be happening in the new chamber is that the necks will be expanding to a larger diameter on firing. If it is the same brass, and so the neck thickness remains unchanged, then the same bushing will give the same neck tension as before.

    What may be affected is the ability of that same bushing to size the (future) larger neck diameter of the the fired cases back down in one neck sizing step with the same degree of concentricity as was being achieved before, as from this point onwards the bushing will have more work to do on the cases fired in the new chamber. It may well be fine, but that is something you may want to check with a concentricity gauge on either the sized necks, or perhaps on the bullets in the finished loaded rounds, if such things are important to you.

    As far as fitting or not fitting a bushing - yes - the bushing has to be fitted. Once you've fired the brass in the new chamber it will become quite apparent why it is required. Again as James has written above, on the existing cases you have from out of the previous chamber, a very tight neck can leave fired cases with a degree of residual neck tension from spring-back in the brass.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Loburn, Canterbury
    Posts
    398
    Awesome advice thanks,

    I am not using the old neck turned brass.

    Thinking back, I loaded 100 rounds all from new Lapua brass, shot extremely well, 0.6moa.

    I best go pull my dies out and I think the neck diameter has been stamped on the barrel

    I will report back

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Loburn, Canterbury
    Posts
    398
    So…..

    I have opened the die and you can see the sizing is from the bottom of the neck down. That said the neck has to pass through top of the shoulder in the die so likely some sizing occurs.

    My bushing is .291 and the new chamber is .298

    Would it be correct in saying that I should be running a .296 bushing?

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Bay of Plenty
    Posts
    140
    Just measure the OD of a fired case neck and subtract 0.002" and that should be your bushing size, or very close to.
    Stag likes this.
    Just going to take a look around the next bend...

  8. #8
    Member zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    4,986
    So what you're saying is you loaded up using new brass. This brass is yet to be sized?

    If you still have any rounds loaded measure the outside diameter of the neck. Measure in two places 12 o'clock to 6 o'clock and 3 o'clock to nine o'clock. If your brass is good quality you should get close to the same readings. Average the measurements. I usually deduct 2 thou to determine the bushing size.
    With springback that usually gives around 1.5 neck tension. As the brass hardens and if you don't anneal the springback and neck tension will change. You either anneal or select a different bushing.

    A lot of gunsmiths only stamp the neck dimension on the barrel if it is a tight neck. Yours may be different and the smith may have stamped the std neck dimension.

    Edit: I see you have posted 298.
    Last edited by zimmer; 29-08-2021 at 09:27 PM.
    Puffin and Stag like this.

  9. #9
    Member zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    4,986
    Quote Originally Posted by 38 South View Post
    Just measure the OD of a fired case neck and subtract 0.002" and that should be your bushing size, or very close to.
    I'd like this but my like button has gone awol.

  10. #10
    Lovin Facebook for hunters kiwijames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    7,108
    Quote Originally Posted by Stag View Post
    So…..

    I have opened the die and you can see the sizing is from the bottom of the neck down. That said the neck has to pass through top of the shoulder in the die so likely some sizing occurs.

    My bushing is .291 and the new chamber is .298

    Would it be correct in saying that I should be running a .296 bushing?
    No, in the instance there is no relationship between the brass and the chamber other than one sits in the other. You need to either know the wall thickness atvthe neck and the projectile OD, or the easier method is measure the neck of a loaded round as this will be the sum of the two. Measure 5-10 off them and take the average. This is your loaded neck OD. For the brass to grip the projectile you need neck tension. Essentially it is an interference fit between the case neck and the projectile. I would sugest anything from 2-4 thou for a hunting rifle, and maybe 1-2 for a target rifle. I don't know what a 6.5 is going to measure but an example may be if a loaded round measured 0.295" and you wanted 2 thou tension your bushing would be 0.293". Expect about 1/2 thou spring in the brass so really a 0.293" bush may give closer to 0.2935" or only 1-1/2 thou neck tension.
    Last edited by kiwijames; 29-08-2021 at 09:26 PM.
    Puffin, zimmer and T.FOYE like this.
    The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice. And because we fail to notice that we fail to notice, there is little we can do to change; until we notice how failing to notice shapes our thoughts and deeds

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Loburn, Canterbury
    Posts
    398
    Quote Originally Posted by kiwijames View Post
    No, in the instance there is no relationship between the brass and the chamber other than one sits in the other. You need to either know the wall thickness atvthe neck and the projectile OD, or the easier method is measure the neck of a loaded round as this will be the sum of the two. Measure 5-10 off them and take the average. This is your loaded neck OD. For the brass to grip the projectile you need neck tension. Essentially it is an interference fit between the case neck and the projectile. I would sugest anything from 2-4 thou for a hunting rifle, and maybe 1-2 for a target rifle. I don't know what a 6.5 is going to measure but an example may be if a loaded round measured 0.295" and you wanted 2 thou tension your bushing would be 0.293". Expect about 1/2 thou spring in the brass so really a 0.293" bush may give closer to 0.2935" or only 1-1/2 thou neck tension.
    Makes sense thanks. My calipers are shit so wouldn’t be confident in the measurement that fine. I will get something sorted so I can solve this problem with confidence.
    Thanks

  12. #12
    Member Puffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    974
    There are some recorded measurements for the 6.5-284 Lapua brass neck thickness on the usual forums that a search should turn up if you go looking.
    0.015" appears to be the figure to expect, your loaded rounds will then measure close to 0.294",
    being 0.015" + 0.264" + 0.015", as measured in the way both Zimmer and KiwiJames describe in posts #9 and #11 respectively.

    Your starting point for a bushing would then be 0.292", being 0.002" under the loaded round diameter of 0.294".
    This is exactly the same selection criteria as Zimmer and KiwiJames have provided above with the difference being that in James's post he has taken the neck wall thickness to be 0.0155" giving a loaded round diameter of 0.295", so his bushing selection was 0.002" under that.
    Hopefully that makes sense?

    Your 0.298" chamber diameter across the neck indicates that (if the brass thickness is indeed 0.015" per side) that you have four-thousanths of an inch total clearance for the brass at the neck to expand into on firing to release the bullet, or 0.002" all the way around the diameter between neck and chamber wall. That is generally considered to be a "no turn" chambering; as implied - sufficient clearance to use the brass without needing to worry about turning.

    The die does not size the neck if there is no bushing in place. While the hole at the top might look narrow there will be clearance to allow the necks to pass through untouched. Actually there is a small region of the case - right at the shoulder-neck junction that neither the die or the bushing contacts, even when the bushing is screwed right down, and it shouldn't be screwed hard down but backed off a fraction of a turn so that the bushing can "float" - rattle around sideways when you shake the die. I think this is all laid out in the set-up instructions for the dies if you have them?
    kiwijames and Stag like this.

  13. #13
    Member outdoorlad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    2,943
    @Stag your current 291 bushing will be fine with unturned Lapua brass, giving you probably 3-4” neck tension on the pill.
    kiwijames, Puffin, mikee and 1 others like this.
    Shut up, get out & start pushing!

  14. #14
    Lovin Facebook for hunters kiwijames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    7,108
    As an aside. It's quite interesting to note how stable even 2thou of neck tension is. My pills feel as if they are made of butter when seating and I'd always wondered if they are not going to slip out or go out of true. So far, so good in a purely hunting rifle setup.
    Neck tension is yet another reloading rabbit hole to fall down I have chosen to steer well clear of. When shit works I try not to mess with it any further.
    Stag likes this.
    The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice. And because we fail to notice that we fail to notice, there is little we can do to change; until we notice how failing to notice shapes our thoughts and deeds

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Bay of Plenty
    Posts
    140
    0.002" is generally sufficient, it's an interference fit, even a size for size fit requires force to assemble/disassemble, this is true of any size for size fit.
    Stag likes this.
    Just going to take a look around the next bend...

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!