Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

ZeroPak Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
Like Tree13Likes

Thread: Retained velocity

  1. #1
    ebf
    ebf is offline
    Mushroom juice ! Hic ! ebf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Above the Hutt
    Posts
    6,872

    Retained velocity

    Might be having a blond moment here, but can someone please try to explain the physics behind the reason higher BC projectiles have higher retained velocity ?
    Viva la Howa ! R.I.P. Toby | Black rifles matter... | #illegitimate_ute

  2. #2
    Ejected
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Shaky City
    Posts
    1,446
    They slow down more slowly due to less air resistance.
    338 and ebf like this.

  3. #3
    GWH
    GWH is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Napier, Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    4,456
    Its all aerodynamics, you are def having a blonde moment.
    ebf likes this.

  4. #4
    Ejected
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    128
    Imagine throwing a small chunk of lead, and a screwed up piece of paper that weighs the same. Five metres out, the chunk of lead will still be travelling at a hefty speed but the paper will have pretty much stopped.

  5. #5
    Member Dead is better's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    976
    It's all to do with one Krupp cannon round isn't it? That's the standard velocity so that all projectiles can be compared as a persentage of. That's why the higher bc bullets go further (have higher retained velocity). Not sure how old this is but I'm sure it's on Wikipedia someplace

  6. #6
    Member Dead is better's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    976
    Errr I kinda compacted history a bit there. There's about 6 people involved with that over about 400 years (not just mein krupp). The short story is that it's not a real round. It's a theoretical norm for the boffins to have calculator fights over. There I go again haha

  7. #7
    Member GravelBen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Gorrre
    Posts
    3,600
    What they said... more efficient/less drag so it takes longer to slow down.

  8. #8
    ebf
    ebf is offline
    Mushroom juice ! Hic ! ebf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Above the Hutt
    Posts
    6,872
    Had a look at Litz's chapter on BC again, he simply states that the heavier a bullet is, the better it can penetrate the air.

    BC = (weight/7000) / (cal X cal X form factor). So from this formula, it is obvious that for a given form factor, a heavier projectile will have a higher BC.

    All good, but I want to know WHY ?
    Viva la Howa ! R.I.P. Toby | Black rifles matter... | #illegitimate_ute

  9. #9
    Numzane Spudattack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    2,990
    Inertia, a heavier bullet has more inertia than light one, therefore with the drag being equal it will take longer to lose its velocity.

    If you then have a lower drag coefficient (shape) you have less force slowing it, so less drag, more inertia means it takes longer to be slowed.

    Sent from my SM-G360G using Tapatalk
    "Here's the deal I'm the best there is. Plain and simple. I wake up in the morning and I piss excellence."

  10. #10
    Caretaker stug's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Rolleston, Canterbury
    Posts
    4,866
    Possibly inertia. A heavier projectile will have more inertia and therefore require a larger force to slow it down. Because the atmosphere effectively exerts the same force on all projectiles a heavier projectile will slow down slower.

    Bugger Spudattack is a faster typer than me.
    ebf, Spudattack and Beaker like this.

  11. #11
    ebf
    ebf is offline
    Mushroom juice ! Hic ! ebf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Above the Hutt
    Posts
    6,872
    Aha, thanks spud & stug. I knew it was something fundamental that I just could not get my head around
    Viva la Howa ! R.I.P. Toby | Black rifles matter... | #illegitimate_ute

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Omaru
    Posts
    554
    I was confused with this for a bit as well.... a higher drag coefficient Cd, means it will slow down faster, a lower ballistic coefficient means it will slow down faster than a higher one.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Parahaki, Whangarei
    Posts
    1,274
    @ebf
    Eben - thanks for the 'blonde moment' mate.
    I've been trying to correlate something similar.
    My 'rough seat of pants' guess went like this:
    SD + initial velocity + best aerodynamic shape = better downrange retained velocity.
    spud & stug explained it much better
    zimmer likes this.

  14. #14
    Member zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    4,986
    If SD = Sectional Density that is another animal again and is a calculated figure related to a projectiles penetration ability. Used to be used by some as a rough guide to killing ability but of course that is dependant on jacket and core design as well.
    Chuck Hawks on SD Sectional Density
    WallyR likes this.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Bay of Plenty
    Posts
    390
    Quote Originally Posted by Spudattack View Post
    Inertia, a heavier bullet has more inertia than light one, therefore with the drag being equal it will take longer to lose its velocity.

    If you then have a lower drag coefficient (shape) you have less force slowing it, so less drag, more inertia means it takes longer to be slowed.

    Sent from my SM-G360G using Tapatalk
    Momentum I think, as inertia amount of energy it takes to make an object move, or a measurement of how hard it is to move something.
    Kinetic energy = 1/2 mass x velocity squared
    So a heavier object has more kinetic energy than a lighter one at the same speed. Bullets are slowed down by friction which reduces the kinetic energy of the bullet. A high BC bullet has low friction and therefore it takes longer for that bullet to lose its kinetic energy/momentum. A heavier high BC bullet has more kinetic energy and therefore takes longer to lose it, sort of. I think BC has weight built into it so it might be more accurate to talk about a heavier bullet with the same drag coefficient.

    Sent from my GT-I8190T using Tapatalk
    Spudattack likes this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. CCI Standard Velocity .22LR
    By Simon in forum NZHS Bulk Buying Section
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 28-07-2016, 06:55 PM
  2. Twist rate vs velocity vs bc
    By veitnamcam in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 09-12-2014, 07:30 AM
  3. OAL effect on pressure and velocity
    By Mossie in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 22-05-2014, 11:57 AM
  4. Short barrel velocity
    By Malhunting in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 28-07-2013, 04:09 PM
  5. 7mm mag 26" velocity
    By Konev in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 24-02-2013, 09:30 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!