No I genuinely believe that this argument has no substance... A thermal has less capacity than a dog.
I genuinely believe that the application of a dog to indicate, track and find is an unfair advantage.
So are firearms, knives helicopter bows, vehicles or horses, binoculars or advanced levels of fitness.
I genuinely believe that people who continuously bring up a subjective viewpoint of what is or isn't ethical, while actively using technological advantage in other areas to hunt animals; are simply logically inconsistent. Or to speak plainly - are just hypocrites.
The point of hunting is to meet your own level of ethical standard & expectation, not to continually try and impose personal standards on others.
To try doing that while you undoubtably use technological advantage in other areas makes this argument invalid.
Bookmarks