Printable View
I'm looking at getting binoculars that will last me a very very long time......Leica HD-B's. My plan is to get 10X42's. But if I get 8X42's they will throw in a set of Ultravid 10X25's for free. At the very least I could sell these. Which has me thinking.......Are 10X42's better than 8X42's???
10X42's - greater magnification
8X42's - greater field of view, better light gathering
What do you guys/girls think?
10x
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Depends on your application. Always liked 8x for their field of view and low light performace as you say. I would recommend 8x42 for most North Island applications.
Down south though with the greater distances to glass i would go for 10x42s.
I brought 10x42s myself and given most of my hunting is North island i probably should have got the 8x42s or 8x32s.
10x25s are great as they are super small and light weight but loose on the low light ability and comfort over long periods of glassing.
i have 8x geovids, plenty enough magnification to spot animals, this is south island country included. cant really see how a 10x could spot any more animals to be honest.
With a free set of ultravids thrown in seems like a bit of a no brainer to me?
When you are spotting the head of a tahr over or in scrub at 1.5-2.0km, 10x comes in handy. The extra 25% is significant, more so if you are not carrying a spotter to then assess animals after that - well, in my experience anyway. I'll be first to admit my eyesight isn't awesome.
I had a set of 8x32 Trinovids, didn't have them long, much prefer the 10x32/42s.
Love my HDBs :)
Had 8x, prefer my 10x.
How much of the field of view do your eyes actually focus on at any one time?
8x will be better at very first and last light though!
10x for me
10x for me, but that's a serious carrot for them to dangle. Why are they throwing a pair in?? Can't they sell 8x binos?? Maybe that's your answer.
I was thinking the same thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshC
I prefer 10 power, especially for distance. I even check from time to time through my scope at 25 power.
Ever heard the saying 'there's no substitute for cubes...'?
No! but id like an explanation:)Quote:
Originally Posted by craigc
I went from 8 x to 10 x I found the 10 power a little more shaky ( less forgiving ) . I only brought 10 x because they where on offer , and I sure 8 x would have been fine .
Can you try them side by side ?
I had 10x25's and 8-20x50's, neither suitable for hunting really. Have been tossing up between 8x42 and 10x42 and figured it wouldn't make much difference to me either way. In the end I found a deal on something in between.
I know some guys that have gone from 8x to 10x and regretted it and some that have done the reverse.
Some people shake like they've got a twenty cup a day caffeine addiction. Pointless paying for premium optics if you're one of those, especially in 10x42.
I'm seriously thinking of upgrading my 30 year old 8x30 Steiner's to a set of Zeiss Victory HT 10x42's. Then again, I might just get the same in 8x42 for the better light gathering in well hunted areas where some of the better animals seem to emerge just on dark. No doubt, if you're checking out Chamois or Tahr horns then 10x would make more sense. Horses for courses.
The main advantage of 8x is smaller size. Partly lost if x42.
Have a feel of the ergonomics. Tried a pair of HD-B10x42 and they are ugly as and the feel is weird like you're sinking your hands into a lump of clay or a pair of bike handlebars or something. Very stable, though. Also the rangefinding is fantastic.
As said, you can only take advantage of mag in you achieve steady hold. Power can compensate for sub-average eyesight.
Don't underrate field of view - makes orientation and scanning easier. Ease of use beats extreme features.
I thought about this for 6 months as it was soooo much money for a set of bino's and I didn't want to make a mistake. I understood the pro's and con's as described above and ended up with the 10x's. I think it was the best decision for me because I have never wondered what it would be like to have less power. But if I had bought the 8X's ... I would have always wondered should I have bought more power ... Go 10X and never look back.
I've got the ED3 Zenray in 10x42 and they are great glass as good as almost everything I've looked through but when I looked through cat slayers Swarvos in 8 power I was sold on less handshake and better glass for me at least. The ability to have a hold that didn't bounce around when your breathing hard made up for more horsepower. I've got a set of 8x36 as well now and they are easier to look through when your on the hill and puffing like an old steam engine.
Yeah I love the 8x. If I need to look at something a bit closer like tahr/cham horns I will look through my scope at 22x... cant see how you can make a call on tahr or cham heads any better with 10x than 8x, its not that bigger gain.
Looking through my Leupold VX-6 2-12x scope on 8x then 10x shows up as quite a difference, a lot more than I thought it would. I suppose a 25% increase in magnification should be significant and it is.