How bad is it guys?
Need to replacing my reddot on the ar and don't need minimal magnification
Cheers
Shane
Printable View
How bad is it guys?
Need to replacing my reddot on the ar and don't need minimal magnification
Cheers
Shane
Did the 4 moa dot finally drive ya mad mate?
Been mad since the day it went on hahaha
Been avoiding using it
Did the 4 moa dot finally drive ya mad mate?
Being mad might be considered repeating yourself two days in a row[emoji6]Quote:
Originally Posted by BRADS
Yeah that's random as, no idea how that happenedQuote:
Originally Posted by kiwijames
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I've always been curious about these scopes too, but no one had ever posted a worthwhile review that I've ever come across.
The only feature I really care about is repeatability, for dial up use.
Kj
So these are bad or not? LOL. I was thinking of one just to do load development on, the reviews I can find say the are Ok for the money...
I just got one but hardly used it yet.. So I'm curious too
Thats all i csn find aswell
That they are a good cheap scope
Will fit the bill with cheap ammo on a knock about rifle
Didn't Doc Watson post a video of him using one out to 600 odd yards?
Thats legit
People shoot 1000yards with Tasco scopes but that sure as shit doesn't make them legit.Quote:
Originally Posted by 199p
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Was more going of his rep not the scope its self haha
I had one for a bit, the worst thing was its weight. Was repeatable and held zero in hunting situations. I felt the dials were quite mushy on mine and moved pretty easily. Glass was average. The eye relief was pretty good and the drop zone reticle worked on my 16 inch 223 pretty bang on out to 400m. Past that it was a bit hit and miss.
Just discovered a 'problem'... I had it on my AR but thought it might be better off on the bolt action .223 so I attempted to swap it over but the tube of the Bushnell is way too short to fit the rings on the bolt gun - the action is too long for the scope tube :(