If you are going to chop up a Finnlight with the factory fluted barrel, then maybe you should buy the stainless synthetic version 85 and chop it. Its cheaper to buy for a start.
If you are going to chop up a Finnlight with the factory fluted barrel, then maybe you should buy the stainless synthetic version 85 and chop it. Its cheaper to buy for a start.
At the risk of sounding ignorant, can I ask why? Something to do with cutting the barrel back into the fluted section? And/or are you telling me the only difference between a Finnlight and S/S 85 is the flutes, and it would be better to get and 85, chop the barrel, and then flute that if so inclined?
TIA.
Helluva a lot cheaper to buy a T3 and chop that...spend the extra $$$ on optics just my 2¢ :-)
Yeah you still cant top of the mag though
Yea that, if you feed the chamber from the mag as most would and dont fire you then have to drop the mag and reload the mag close the bolt and re insert the mag vs extract live round and stuff it down with your hand into the mag and close the bolt on an empty chamber.
"Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.
308Win One chambering to rule them all.
Gimp seems to do plenty well with a 20 inch 260. 27-2800 should still be achievable with 140's no? go with the factory length and whack a suppressor on the end. Lop of an inch is you fancy it should still have you clear of the flutes. My rifle is an 18" plus can, honestly I dont think an extra 1 or 2 inches would make any practical difference in the bush
Was referring that it could be a cost saving by buying the 85 SS if shortening. You could probably buy & do the surgery plus put money towards the suppressor with the difference in cost between the two rifles. However if you intended to flute it, then the advantage is lost.
Bookmarks