So I know you guys hate cheap scopes. But if you had to chose between the cheapo gun city scope or the bushnell that comes with everything scope, which would you use?
Printable View
So I know you guys hate cheap scopes. But if you had to chose between the cheapo gun city scope or the bushnell that comes with everything scope, which would you use?
Bushnell because at least the NZ Bushnell agents will stand behind it if it fails. Otherwise for cheap but not so nasty the entry level Nikons are not too bad.
Yep, I would use the bushy, I had a banner that came on a rifle second(third,fourth?) hand that broke and the agent replaced at no cost so at least they have backup!
Nikons are really good for the money.
If you need a cheapo the nikko nite eaters will do the job.
Bushnell.
Either of those above Weaver
I bought a Marlin 795 from Gun City in 2011 (I didn't know any better then, alright?) and it came with some chikkety China 4x32 scope which was pants. I bought a Bushnell 7x32 scope to replace and can't fault it.
Some say it's heavy but at the end of the day it's sitting on a .22 so meh. Puts me onto what I shoot at.
I've had no issues with my Weaver V9, and neither have any of the other people I know who have had Weavers. We've had this conversation before haven't we...Quote:
Originally Posted by veitnamcam
Well I shall never own another :)
Can confirm, gun city scopes are the crappest. I think they reduce in value when they stamp the GC logo on them.
Fair enough, bad experiences with a brand do tend to put you off even when you know other people who have had good experiences.Quote:
Originally Posted by veitnamcam
That's sure the truth!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't really think I've seen any scope gun combo where the scope is worse than a gun city a scope.
Have used 5-6 Bushnells - Sportsman, Banner and Trophy and all were good wee scopes for the buck. Great on 22s.
The three basic 22 scopes I use are Nikko (Nite-eaters are nice scopes for their job), Bushnell and Mueller. All good value for the buck and do well with rimfires.
I have one of these I put on my sons CZ, just a 4x 32, and it holds zero and is ok.Quote:
Originally Posted by MassiveAttack
It came with my Savage, so thought I would make use of it until I got him something better...
However I did remove the GC logo, as that definitely made it look average..
Attachment 34366
^ That's what came with mine, "Outdoor Optics".
Mine fogged first time out. Straight in the binQuote:
Originally Posted by Cartman
This sounds LIKE the way I buy cell phones , after losing one ,
I go to the closet store , and ask to see the cheapest cell phones they have , chick shows me 5 display models , this is a question see has not heard before , so of the 5 cheapest cell phones she has on display , I ask her which does see actually have in the shop to sell , see say these 3 , so by now she is coming to terms with what I want , of thes 3 cheap cell phones , which is the cheapest , she says this ONE , I say thats the one I will buy .
Later Chris
You have doubled the value!Quote:
Originally Posted by grunzter
I'd take a look on Trademe and purchase a decent second hand scope; I'd never again put a cheap shitty scope on any of my rifles. The cheapest scope I current have on a rifle is a 3-9x40 weaver; that has its limitations.
I thought the Nikkon 3-9x40 was the 'come with everything' scope. Happy with mine, a measly $400 worth. Goes all right. Next one will be a Zeiss though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boulderman
Nikko or Nikon? 2 very different things.
Don't get a terraQuote:
Originally Posted by Boulderman
