Thread: March scopes

Until you go to shoot something in low light and have to have it on 2.5 mag to see anything. If you want a march I'm a firm believer it needs to have the 52mm objective on it.

Originally Posted by L.R

Until you go to shoot something in low light and have to have it on 2.5 mag to see anything. If you want a march I'm a firm believer it needs to have the 52mm objective on it.

That's the thing... I never shoot on dusk so spending the extra $1000 for a wider field of view or illuminated reticle is a royal flush down the loo. I've read all the 'hide comments about both scopes and there is a lot of overstated claims on it. Anyone is welcome to come and have a look through my '42 to help make up your own mind. Maybe your eyes are way better than mine I dunno but I'm 100% happy with it. I just wish spuhr made a lower mount that suited the '42 better which is my only minor gripe.