May have snookered myself?
Thinking I was a clever bastard I decided that going to a MIL scope was a great idea (and it was) so I promptly bought baldbobs Premier but I have opened a new can of worms. I have a CRF1200 range finder in yards. I also have a Z5 with BT turret (on my 243AI), which also clicks in MOA (and has a 4W MOA scale reticle). The Z5 is not a big deal as I could live with the elevation marker rings set to metric and fudge the wind but Im guessing I really should be getting a metric rangefinder now? To use yards and MIL sounds like a gangfuck waiting to happen. Im thinking the CRF1600? They can switch between meters/yards?
Bit of a laugh was that the Z5 wants to be metric as the click increments are marked in 5 click intervals:ORLY:
May have snookered myself?
My rangefinder (geovids) are in yards and all my scopes are in mils,
I've never had a problem, all my drop charts go out in 25 yard increments and I just dial the required drop the ballistic program has calculated.
Given the option though I would sell my yard geovids and go metric ;)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
May have snookered myself?
Brain not in gear. ebf is correct, being base 10 the input does not really matter. I think I will find an excuse to get a switch rangefinder though;).
May have snookered myself?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rogers.270
the new leupold RX1000i TBR DNA is brilliant supports so many functions and not over pricy
In a long line of loopy rangefinders that don't work? I would certainly sit on the fence with them until I was sure they could actually range anywhere near the stated distances.