Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Alpine Terminator


User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 35
Like Tree57Likes

Thread: MRAD vs MOA: Which Do You Prefer for Hunting? Considering Zeiss Conquest V6 Purchase

Threaded View

  1. #22
    Codswallop Gibo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    The Hill
    Posts
    23,584
    Quote Originally Posted by Beetroot View Post
    Mil all the way.
    It is true that they are both angular measurements so both do the same thing, for the average hunter it doesn't matter at all as you'll just be using a LRF to range the target, dial your scope and shoot.

    Mils has a few advantages over MOA though that won me over.
    -The smaller numbers (Eg: 4.5mil vs 15.75 MOA) make dope charts less cluttered and quicker/easier to read.
    -Turrets are often quicker/easier to read with the less numbers.
    -Reticles with hold marks tend to make more sense (Eg the large hold marks are always 1Mil (with .5 or .2mil in between) where as MOA can be either 4, 2 or 1 for the main hashes and you need to remember what easy reticle uses).
    -Quick drop forumlas (see Hunter Nicks post above) work much better with Mils than MOA.
    -You can use the quick wind call "Gun Number" (you'll need to google it) much better with Mils than MOA.
    So you struggle to count over 10! I love it
    chainsaw and TakaRat like this.

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!