No it is quite valid, as putting a microscope to specific areas, i.e mental health, criminal activity, firearm security....practical firearms training, where needed.
Identifying actual cause and improvements in these areas rather than a naive approach of blanket rules on things that will not make any positive change to anything but sound good at the time broadcast to media.
This would come through a consultative approach from the firearms community. As pointed out by Mikee, fat chance of happening, so court cases like above is our only approach with an unreasonable, non pragmatic crowd on the other side.
Bookmarks