Thread: Police at it again

Originally Posted by Husky1600

After the public consultation meeting in ChCh, I wrote that Mike Mcilraith had said emphatically 4 or 5 times " the Arms Act is not being changed" and I wrote that he had said that "they are in the process of rewriting policy right now" This is some of the rewritten policy, all thanks to Stuart Nash and Police! The next policy change they will try to roll out will be something along the lines that if you own any firearm or part of a firearm that can be used to make a MSSA, then that will be classed as E Cat and you will require an E Cat endorsement to own it. The devils in the detail boys, the devils in the detail and they're coming for us!

i was there too. (i was the one that said get your kids into guns, they will never afford drugs)
to be honest he was ok. the issue is cahill , the lefty government and pathetic sentences given for firearms violaions

Originally Posted by gonetropo

i was there too. (i was the one that said get your kids into guns, they will never afford drugs)
to be honest he was ok. the issue is cahill , the lefty government and pathetic sentences given for firearms violaions

Cahill isn't able to make the police policy changes though?

Originally Posted by Danger Mouse

Cahill isn't able to make the police policy changes though?

Exactly. It's not Cahill, he is just the mouth piece to front the real agenda. It is someone at PNHQ hierarchy - About time we all had a name to the face yeah?

Originally Posted by gonetropo

i was there too. (i was the one that said get your kids into guns, they will never afford drugs)
to be honest he was ok. the issue is cahill , the lefty government and pathetic sentences given for firearms violaions

Personally I think you've got that wrong.
Sure Mike seemed ok at the meetings, it was his job to appear that way and everything he said was lip service.
Cahill is nothing but a mouth piece for Mike and his CO's, where they can't be seen to saying the things he does.
Mike's office are the perpetrators of this policy, Mike is the head of that office. Police have been trying this stuff on and off testing the waters before there was ever a labour government also.
This isn't the government, this is the unelected government, the police.

Originally Posted by Jexla

Personally I think you've got that wrong.
Sure Mike seemed ok at the meetings, it was his job to appear that way and everything he said was lip service.
Cahill is nothing but a mouth piece for Mike and his CO's, where they can't be seen to saying the things he does.
Mike's office are the perpetrators of this policy, Mike is the head of that office. Police have been trying this stuff on and off testing the waters before there was ever a labour government also.
This isn't the government, this is the unelected government, the police.

I am reluctant to believe you, just don't want to. I want to believe in the good of government and police, I suppose just like the victim of a con artist later describes he or she deeply wanted to believe the con artist was honest and straight. Disappointing, what else to say.

Anyway, this is clearly what the recent redacted police recommendations to the minister of police were about. If that is the case and a conversation took place on this topic I just can't imagine MOP is entirely ignorant of this deliberate obstructionism being carried out now. Two-face?