Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT Black Watch


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree6Likes
  • 6 Post By Beavis

Thread: Range Report: NEA 5.56 Micro Can

  1. #1
    Member Beavis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Cape
    Posts
    3,833

    Range Report: NEA 5.56 Micro Can

    I noticed Digit at nzar15.com had the NEA 5.56 cans in stock finally, so I made some enquires and he offered to send me one of the micro cans up to evaluate. I had always been interested in one and wanted to know how well it worked.

    First impressions
    This is a tiny can for a center fire rifle.

    Light weight for an all steel unit. The overall finish was neat and clean, the machining looked well done and the finish looks and feels robust. I’m not sure what the coating actually is, it feels like some kind of paint, perhaps it is nitride. The NEA website isn’t exactly forthcoming with information on the units. I was however immediately sceptical of its ability as a sound suppressor. The end is actually machined in a star pattern with what appears to be a an attempt to vector gasses at a 45 degree angle to the bore, I am guessing to serve as somewhat of a compensator.

    There appears to be two or three expansion chambers in the small unit. Not much in there to trap hot gasses. Digit tells me that they were designed to drop the noise signature by 16db, and also to eliminate muzzle flash in an entry weapon, for safety reasons during meth lab raids… Overall I get the impression that NEA has attempted to make an allround muzzle device – incorporating a suppressor, linear compensator and flash suppressor into the same unit, in a package that will not significantly increase the front weight and length of a rifle. Another use I can see is using it as a gas trap for short barrelled rifles, which may suffer from reliability issues due to decreased dwell time in the gas system (much like the Noveske KX3 and trumpet brake on an AKSU-74).
    This can also appears to be designed to use a crush washer, otherwise there is a small gap between the can and barrel. It would probably be fine to use without, but it may rotate and come loose under sustained fire. We don’t like baffle strikes now do we.


    Testing
    I have limited means (read no scientific equipment), so the test and comparisons were entirely subjective. The test platform was my 16” Colt LE6940 upper, shooting a handload consisting of a 77gr Nosler Custom Competition, in front of 22.4gr of ADI BM2.


    I compared the NEA can to my DPT muzzle can. This in an inexpensive alloy can, which performs well for the money, but to my ears, is not totally hearing safe. I have added some comparison videos. The quality isn’t good, take it for what it’s worth.







    I found that the NEA can was definitely louder than the DPT, not by much though, but absolutely not safe to unprotected ears up close. I still found the suppression to be greater than what I expected. I didn’t run it wet, I don’t know if you can or whether it will make a difference. It also does noticeably reduce muzzle flip, it acts quite well as a brake. I did an extended string of rounds off the bench on a paper target and the muzzle sat fairly level. My ejection patterned changed from a consistent 5 o’clock with no can to 3-30, indicating that it does not over gas my rifle a lot, unlike all other regular cans. The can never came loose at all, but in fairness it didn’t get that much of a work out either.

    Conclusion
    I think that this would be more appropriately marketed as a “muzzle device”, not a dedicated suppressor, lest somebody buy it and shoot it a lot without muffs on. It is more of a linear brake/flash hider that also reduces sound signature. I feel that the suppression of sound would be much more if NEA had made it with an enclosed end and more baffles.

    Pros
    Light weight, but still all steel – can take sustained fire
    Reduces muzzle rise
    Adds barely any noticeable length to your rifle
    Will reduce sound signature for those around the shooter

    Cons
    Not hearing safe to the shooter, or anybody immediately next to them
    Most of the features appear to be a compromise to make all of them work together, in my opinion it would have been better to focus on doing one thing well – sound suppression, other benefits like braking and flash suppression are inherent to sound suppressors anyway.

    Beavis

  2. #2
    Gone But Not Forgotten Toby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Wouldn't you like to know
    Posts
    11,099
    Cool little write up there. More reveiws would be quite nice to see on the forum

  3. #3
    Member hunter308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    3,084
    Nice write up Beavis, was good to be able to be there to see the testing of those suppressors being done.
    RULE 4: IDENTIFY YOUR TARGET BEYOND ALL DOUBT


    To be a Human is to be an Alien, ask the animals, We invade this world and we are killing it, we are destroying the earth and nobody gives a fuck except for the animals
    .

  4. #4
    ebf
    ebf is offline
    The gnome returns ! ebf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Hutt Valley
    Posts
    5,001
    Nice writeup Beavis, good practical review
    Viva la Howa ! R.I.P. Toby
    Black rifles matter...

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Police Report just came in.
    By Dundee in forum Firearm Safety
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 17-03-2014, 08:43 PM
  2. New Year's Eve report
    By Nathan F in forum Hunting
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-01-2014, 06:31 PM
  3. Stock wanted for Browning micro
    By Barefoot in forum Buy, Sell or Swap
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-12-2013, 06:35 PM
  4. .22 Marlin Micro 70 Semi
    By Happy in forum Buy, Sell or Swap
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 20-05-2013, 03:31 PM
  5. half-assed range report
    By gimp in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 09-01-2012, 11:46 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!