Does anyone have one of these and how do you compare them to hardy or dpt supressors . Cheers
Phill
Printable View
Does anyone have one of these and how do you compare them to hardy or dpt supressors . Cheers
Phill
Hoping to try my new one out tomorrow... I'll let you know
Yes have have had a couple.
Similar in performance to the ones you mentioned.
Impressed. Bigger than expected... couple of extra baffles forward of the muzzle as mostly will be shooting subs.
The supers reduced sound well for me. Pleasant To shoot. The guy next to me looked over and said "that's quiet!".
The subsonics were like a subsonic suppressed .22. Very happy. Would have thought It was a misfire if i hadn't seen the hole appear in the target with first shot.
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y37...psiglzefhx.jpg
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y37...svkz1tct4.jpeg
Haven't used a competitors suppressor on that calibre (.300blk) so hard to compare.
Anyone else got any experience with these?
Keen on a comparison with a dpt magnum.
I have a Hardy suppressor on my 6.5 x 55. It's pretty good, but I was recently standing behind a mate with a SSRNZ suppressor on his .308 my reaction was the same as that quoted above: "wow, that's quiet." I think they're really good and I'm pretty keen to give one a try next time I'm in the market. I like the way you can add and subtract baffles.
Hmm... I like quiet!
Will have to investigate further.
I'd say all the common ones, hardy, gunworks, dpt etc will be almost identical to one another in terms of sound reduction. Mostly comes down to asthetics.
Longevity is also to be considered in a supressor.
The SSRNZ ones have stainless inserts in each baffle cone, meaning they will not corrode out like some of the other brands. Guess it comes down to how many shots you put through your rifle.
I have a 7 mm ssrnz suppressor here, extremely quiet, had about 15 shots through it.
14x1 thread
$500
http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/12...7eefafdb02.jpg
Man... I would but I need my rifle threaded too.
Just waiting for the courier now..... Sent the Barrelled action off to Scott on Monday and it's already winging it's way back.
Ok so size wise compared to the DPT it is a bit bigger.
Same diameter though and comes back over the barrel further with a bit more forward of the muzzle.
Weighs 200 gram more but I'll take that for stainless.
A few pics of identical rifles with DPT and SSRNZ
http://i816.photobucket.com/albums/z...ps3vevyetk.jpg
http://i816.photobucket.com/albums/z...psmdsgq1v7.jpg
http://i816.photobucket.com/albums/z...psfoj9y0t5.jpg
On top of that difference SQ on my .243 I took a baffle off my DLT as soon as I got it, and it is just fine. Makes it less than 4" forward (about 3.25" I think). Its looking a bit corroded inside after a couple of hundred shots, but I guess thats the disadvantage of being able to see inside of them.
For the price of a DPT I think i'll just shoot the crap out of mine and then replace it. The suppressor should outlast a couple of barrels on my .243 and hence I treat mine like a disposable item.
Yep. Exactly right.
I wanted a quieter version for my .243 and not bothered by the extra weight.
Pleasantly surprised with the size and weight.
Scott will do a muzzle-forward version on request. It is still a little bit heavier than the DPT muzzle-forward mainly due to a heavier wall thickness in the primary chamber and a small increase in weight over the DPT per baffle. I've migrated over to a MF SSRNZ from a DPT on the bush rifle to support local innovation, but also dropped a baffle out. I like it.
SSRNZ are all aluminium other than the inserts mentioned earlier. The weight of the over-barrel comes down to the design and material thicknesses used. I found it better balanced on an intentionally heavier weapon.
One is on the 223 and the other is .243 so there is s noise difference.
I will say that when they're fired from a hill top with no surrounds they're very quiet.
Will you be making strings of shots?