Thread: What to do what to do....

Originally Posted by Gillie

Have you tried them all? Which do you prefer? After playing with all of the above in different calibers i would stay with the finnlight.

I have handled all and would agree but I just cant pay that money, my brother has an A7, a montana and owned a tikka t3 lite, I like all of them though

Originally Posted by Gillie

I would guess they think that adding a scope to it really increases the value. Unfortuanately most people tend to look at a rifle for the value of the rifle alone. A scope makes it more attractive but doesn't normally add much value. Well not unless it is exactly the scope you are looking for.

I may not always be the brightest spark but thats something I've always taken into consideration. 4 of the 5 were bare and the one with a scope was saving you around $400 on buying the whole set up new.

Originally Posted by Gillie

Is this pricing in Aussie dollars? If so he brought a kimber, bedding it, got the action and trigger worked over and it still only shoots MOA... I hope hes shooting factory ammunition through it.

All Aussie dollars, here a new montana is around $2200 so he's asking what I consider realistic money on a second hand gun, It has not done a hell of a lot of work I dont think.[/QUOTE]

Originally Posted by Gillie

Nice choice of scope. I believe in spending at least more than half the value of the rifle on the scope. The Tikka at $940 would give you an extra $600 to put towards your scope over the kimber.

That is one way I'm looking at it, pretty much its either saving that money and getting the overral setup cheaper or paying extra and having a better gun....

Cheers for the input mate