Thread: 2005ish GrandCherokee vs 2007ish Ford Territory

Originally Posted by Steve123

Published fuel figures for a territory dont seem that much more than my falcon.
Are they lies?
Looks like the jeeps out. Last time I ignored lots of car advice I ended up with a Sierra wagon. Never again.

Sent from my SM-G390Y using Tapatalk

I don't have any first hand experience but the territory should be thirstier than a falcon, especially the 4x4 version and town driving.
If I were doing a lot of kms and towing I'd definitely get the diesel, but the petrol is probably a little more reliable and is cam chain driven so doesn't need a cambelt doing.

Both the 2.7 diesel and 4.0 petrol have gone into a lot of other cars so there is plenty of info out about them both.

Originally Posted by Beetroot

I don't have any first hand experience but the territory should be thirstier than a falcon, especially the 4x4 version and town driving.
If I were doing a lot of kms and towing I'd definitely get the diesel, but the petrol is probably a little more reliable and is cam chain driven so doesn't need a cambelt doing.

Both the 2.7 diesel and 4.0 petrol have gone into a lot of other cars so there is plenty of info out about them both.

I've got the 4 litre petrol at the moment but need more ground clearance and room. The XR6 is fun to drive but not practical. With the way the things depreciating I'm tempted to keep it as well.