Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

ZeroPak Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
Like Tree23Likes
  • 21 Post By Ryan_Songhurst
  • 1 Post By Bol Tackshin
  • 1 Post By Steve123

Thread: Vortex Diamondback HD 10x42 Review/Comparison

  1. #1
    Full of shit Ryan_Songhurst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    South Island
    Posts
    10,207

    Vortex Diamondback HD 10x42 Review/Comparison

    My sister has recently bought a pair of these binos and seeing as they seem very popular and are often reccomended by others as a good entry level binocular, I have swiped them "new out of the box" for a few days as I have been thinking for a while now about doing some "simple language" reviews on some common items found in the kit of many hunters. I have my Brunton Icon 11x44's for comparison as they are my main hunting binos. The Brunton's are an obscure brand as they manufactured optical equipment for the medical field and went into sports optics only briefly a few years back. Their marketing failed them as they were trying to compete with the big name euros on price and features, without having years of loyal followers, feedback, and reviews to back them. The Icon's are very nice though, I owned these and Swarovski EL 10x42's and when it came time to sell a pair the Swaros went... they are an 11x bino so field of view can suffer compared to an equivalent price range (they retailed at about $3700) 10x, but that has never bothered me and I have always liked plenty of magnification.

    So, first up, whats in the box? The Diamondbacks come packaged in a box complete with Vortex's Glasspak bino chest harness system, which is great if you are starting out and dont have a bino bivvy or similar allready, the Glasspak is reasonably simple and not as refined as some of the aftermarket stuff available, but perfectly functional to protect your binos and keep them close at hand. There is also a Neoprene padded neck strap and a cleaning cloth, along with an owners manual. The binos themselves are made in china, but I think we need to move past the impression that china cannot make good glass, the new Fury HD from Vortex for example is getting very favourable reviews for optical quality and there are many youtube video reviews etc where they are put head to head with the likes of the Leica Geovids, and come out on top.
    Name:  20200613_180302.jpg
Views: 1533
Size:  2.05 MB

    First impressions? The binos themselves seem "small" to me, compared to a lot of other 10x42s I have had. They are reasonably lightweight at about 620 grams, this is not light enough to create an impression of "mass produced chinese junk" but I do prefer a bit more weight in a bino, especially a 10x or more as a bit of heft helps with holding them steady, this was not a real problem but I did notice that even at 11x and with a smaller field of view, I was able to hold my Icons a lot steadier at their weight of 900 grams. They have a nice rubber armour coating which is "rubbery" enough to feel quality and not "plasticky"
    They are a single bridge design, I dont have any preference in this regard, some people do prefer a twin bridge for whatever reason. The hinge was very stiff out of the box, I actually thought I was going to break them before being able to open/close them, but this has loosened slightly with some use. They come with objective lens caps, and a cover for the eyepiece end which can fit on the neck strap to avoid losing it if you decide to do so. I personally hate caps and stuff hanging on my binos so if they were mine to keep the first thing to go in the bin would be these.

    Optical performance? I have had a chance to get these out in varying light conditions and they have found deer at all stages of the day, they lose a bit of time at last light but I found it hard to tell how much exactly as I can pretty much see in the dark to a degree with my Icons. They will find animals at all sensible hunting times though no problems. I picked these up and would scan for deer at anywhere between 100yds to 1500yds plus and then I would pick up my Icons and see if I could find any animals I had missed with the Diamondbacks. During bright daylight they never failed but during fading light in the evening I did find deer a couple of times tucked up in Matagouri etc with my Icons that I simply could not pick up with the Diamondbacks. Colour rendition is good and I find them to be "true to colour" they provide a crisp sharp image during most conditions but just lose that bit of definition as the light fades.
    Probably the worst trait they have as far as optical quality goes is "purple hazing" which is where a sharp contrast in light ie: skylines, can result in some hazing and chromatic abberation. This is not a real big issue and I have definately seen worse binos (that cost a lot more) but it could be the difference between seeing that head of an animal on the skyline in the distance or not seeing it at all. I have tried to demonstrate this in the photo below, whilst looking at some deer mid shot you can see the hazing on the trees etc along the skyline, the shot is not a true indication of the actual image quality as my phone camera could not produce that anyhow, I could make out all the deer in this shot very easily with the binos.
    Name:  20200613_171306.jpg
Views: 1381
Size:  1.67 MB

    The image is surprisingly proportioned very well, a good test to see how much your binos distort an image is to go and look at a flat horizon, ie: out to sea, place the horizon in either the top or the bottom of your field of view and the degree to which it is "bent" is an indication of how much your binos are actually distorting the image you see whilst using them. I had a chance to do this test with them whilst in Dunedin yesterday and they have very minimal distortion. I have done this test with Leica Ultravids which are worth several times what these binos are worth and they had what I would almost describe as an extreme amount of distortion.

    Final thoughts? For the rrp of $459 (you can find them cheaper also) these Binos really are great value for money, they will find you animals at all sensible hunting times throughout the day, the Vortex Warranty is unbeatable, and they are reasonably well built, everything is tight and smooth on them, the focus wheel has just the right amount of friction to make it easy to use but not too sensitive. The eyecups have the standard three position setup and settle into your desired position solidly. They are never going to compete with the euros etc on the real nitty gritty optical performance stuff, but they stay nice and bright a fair way into twilight for the money. If I had to choose a price bracket that they could compete in, they would definately compete with most binos in the $1000-$1500 range. I could pick on them for things such as the hazing issue and loss of some definition at last light, but we are dealing with a $459 bino here, and they are punching well in most regards. I wouldnt feel disadvantaged as a new hunter using these. A good workhorse binocular.

    Name:  20200613_174729.jpg
Views: 1377
Size:  1.85 MB
    Tahr, veitnamcam, Rich007 and 18 others like this.
    270 is a harmonic divisor number[1]
    270 is the fourth number that is divisible by its average integer divisor[2]
    270 is a practical number, by the second definition
    The sum of the coprime counts for the first 29 integers is 270
    270 is a sparsely totient number, the largest integer with 72 as its totient
    Given 6 elements, there are 270 square permutations[3]
    10! has 270 divisors
    270 is the smallest positive integer that has divisors ending by digits 1, 2, …, 9.

  2. #2
    H.M
    H.M is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Waimate
    Posts
    412
    Cheers mate good review. I am on my 2nd pair now, wore old pair out and got replaced with brand new pair, awesome warranty! Should be at the stage now were i should buy some top binos but i just dont see the need as these do everything i need them to. Great option for new or experinced hunters in my opinion. Cheers.

  3. #3
    Rabbit Herder StrikerNZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    South Canterbury
    Posts
    1,768
    Great write-up, thanks for taking the time to put that together. Should be very helpful for a lot of people

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    2,380
    Great write-up, Ryan. I recently bought a pair of these as well. Awesome value, but the purple hazing (chromatic aberration is the technical term) is pretty bad near the edges, especially in high contrast situations like the skylining you mentioned. In the centre of the image, they are sharp, clear and have great colour rendition.
    Here's a cell phone pic trying to show the effect...
    Name:  IMG_20200518_114343.jpg
Views: 1266
Size:  200.1 KB
    It is cropped, showing mainly the edge of the image so looks worse than through the binos themselves.

    The hinge on mine wasn't as tight out the box as yours. QC issue, perhaps?
    Overall, I'd buy these again.
    Last edited by Bol Tackshin; 14-06-2020 at 10:19 AM.
    Steve123 likes this.

  5. #5
    Member Mathias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Canterbury, home of the big Rakaia Red Stag
    Posts
    4,258
    Good write up. Bought my son a pair ages ago, now his mates are buying them as well, great value for money.

  6. #6
    Member Steve123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Rotorua
    Posts
    3,774
    I bought a pair at the sika show a couple of years ago. Compared them at best as I could with similar priced ones from Leupold and Bushnell and these were better.

    Sent from my SM-G390Y using Tapatalk
    Bol Tackshin likes this.

  7. #7
    Member Rich007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Levin, Horowhenua
    Posts
    1,000
    Awesome review, thanks for taking the time Ryan
    If my work annoys me, I cull them

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Stewart island / canterbury
    Posts
    9,186
    Have a pair of these and a pair of leupold mackenzies, prefer the vortex for ergonomics mainly and not much between them optically

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Helensville, Auckland
    Posts
    473
    Good read, thanks

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Vortex diamondback 10x42
    By Danny in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-05-2017, 11:36 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!