E cat question

Yeah it won't fly, don't worry ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by small_caliber

As I said there is more than "one" owner of Guncity and instead of leaving it blank as to who he's referring to he should name them.......otherwise it is a possibility that a non criminal owner could pursue slander and defamation.

At the end of the day it won't affect my pocket if they did, but under current slander/defamation law it could affect this forum.

---

What are you, a GC staff member?

There are far worse website forum discussions on other hunting and fishing sites regarding that company. One where even GC replied.
So why don't you go and read those for fun.

Awesome fishing and hunting New Zealand. Fishing and Hunting forum. www.fishnhunt.co.nz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by small_caliber

Or is everyone who is defending what Yukon posted saying ALL owners of Gun City ARE criminals?? I might be misinterpreting what everyone is saying!!!

---

Nah, but you are starting to make a mountain out of a mole hill though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by small_caliber

I might be misinterpreting what everyone is saying!!!

---

Actually yes you are. You're extrapolating a statement that is factually accurate when dealing with the generalisation it was presented in.

The majority shareholder of a business can sometimes be referred to as "the owner" even though there are multiple shareholders.

Wtf guys

I guess I will say what people are thinking.
Yes many may not like GC like me but if they are the cheapest I will deal with them.

They honoured a warranty on an item of theirs which I didn't buy. They didn'thave to but they did .

We all may bitch and moan about them and yes David tipple is a felon, but there are far worse people out there. He has good business sense and if there was an issue about him been near guns, then they wouldn't be dealers would they.

I think enough has been said about the Tipples and gun city so let's end it there and move on.

They have shit we want and I will be buying a few rifles from them in the next few months.

And I bet deep down, people will buy from them just cause they are cheap. Yet they won't admit it in this forum. Will they.....

Also how did we get here from an e cat question anyway.

I don't buy from them because they are not cheap


We ended up here because a mis-informed (or bullshitting) Gun City salesperson was spreading misinformation about E endorsements.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gimp

I don't buy from them because they are not cheap


We ended up here because a mis-informed (or bullshitting) Gun City salesperson was spreading misinformation about E endorsements.

---

Some of the stuff is cheap. But like all places, they have expensive stuff to. I only buy stuff on sale to be honest.

We have the same AO. He's great and got me to do the same thing. Now everything is on my application form.

A good idea might be to put down "all lawful sufficient and proper purposes congruent with s45 of the Arms Act 1983."

I put that down and it wasn't questioned and no condition as to use was otherwise put on the endorsement

Found out mines been issued :) just waiting for card to arrive


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Mines on the way to the moon I guess... :oh noes:

Ah mine turned up. Sent them new passport photos but they chose to use the photo that makes me look about 12


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by grunzter

Mines on the way to the moon I guess... :oh noes:

---

Probably with my CZ858 and 6 extra mags import permit.

:pissed off:

What a messed up thread. How about we ignore the slander towards certain gun stores and discuss the topic at hand? E cats.

it was a vEry good day for me finally... :)

I handed in the form for my E on Thursday, referees were interviewed on Friday, I was booked in to be interviewed on Monday evening but an urgent job came in so he popped around yesterday morning and the application is off to PNHQ today, hopefully. Our vetter up here is great.

I must admit reading what ppl post here the police dont seem particularly anti-getting your E.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by steven

I must admit reading what ppl post here the police dont seem particularly anti-getting your E.

---

Its really a win-win for them, namely more firearms users having better security and knowing who owns what out there, unlike the unknown numbers (to them) of A-Cat ARs in flimsy safes and wall mounts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Savage1

I handed in the form for my E on Thursday, referees were interviewed on Friday, I was booked in to be interviewed on Monday evening but an urgent job came in so he popped around yesterday morning and the application is off to PNHQ today, hopefully. Our vetter up here is great.

---

Is it the same older ginger gentleman, quite burly?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dogmatix

Its really a win-win for them, namely more firearms users having better security and knowing who owns what out there, unlike the unknown numbers (to them) of A-Cat ARs in flimsy safes and wall mounts.

---

That's a very good point

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tommy

That's a very good point

---

Same as why they love trademe selling guns, leaves a paper trail

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ryan

Is it the same older ginger gentleman, quite burly?

---

Nah skinny older guy, ex cop, great fella.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by res

Same as why they love trademe selling guns, leaves a paper trail

---

Those mail order forms don't get copied or kept by Police, well not up here anyway.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Savage1

Those mail order forms don't get copied or kept by Police, well not up here anyway.

---

I have seen mine get photocopied, so assumed it was standard practice

But really I was meaning an online trail.

Personally I think it's a good thing, I know some others will strongly disagree with that