Thread: Farmlands

Originally Posted by Cigar

I expect that because the staff need to have a FAL, to get that FAL they require secure storage at home (like the rest of us). So who pays for that? If I was the staff member I would be asking the company to pay.

Just a thought. If you had a FAL, but no gun, would you still be required to have secure storage?

Originally Posted by outlander

Just a thought. If you had a FAL, but no gun, would you still be required to have secure storage?

currently yes, because you could buy a gun at any time.

Originally Posted by Percy Jones

currently yes, because you could buy a gun at any time.

True, but wouldn't that be the time to acquire secure storage? Hypothetically, you could have the firearm within your control 24/7 and not need secure storage at all. The question becomes relevant once again, when the inspector person interviews and checks on storage for said non existent firearm. Perhaps then, one is required by law to own a firearm once the license is issued, which in turn, makes the secure storage necessary, but not if it's under your immediate care.

@Sideshow One of your paragraphs caused me to seek further information

Yep that will be the next move cutting down to only what you can justify.....(they do this here for rifle ammo in the UK) But it will be worse for you in NZ because shotguns are not a right.

What are the "limits" and how are they justified? A link will be fine if it is a lengthy matter.

What is the reasoning to exclude shotguns from those limitations" Again, a link will be fine if it is a lengthy matter.

Finally, whatever do you mean when you say "in NZ shotguns are not a right"? i ask 'cos no firearms of any sort are a "right" here in Middle Earth.

Thank You