Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Darkness ZeroPak


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: How well do your cheap scopes track?

  1. #1
    Member suthy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    North Canterbury
    Posts
    244

    How well do your cheap scopes track?

    I've been mucking around with the 22 a lot lately and been dialing using the Nikko Stirling Panamax 3-9 that came on it.
    I was not expecting it to be amazing/perfect and I know 22lr is not the best for testing this either but I though it would be a good way to spend the arvo.

    Anyway I've been getting some slightly unexpected results when shooting out past 100m so I set up a target with a 29.1mm grid @ 50m and got shooting.
    Name:  To Post  001.jpg
Views: 684
Size:  1.18 MB
    All shots are aimed @ the centre target taking 1x shot at each target by dialing accordingly. Then repeating until each target has 5x shots.
    Name:  To Post  003.jpg
Views: 691
Size:  534.5 KB
    I think this shows that the Panamax is quite repeatable but it shows approximately the same MOA error I've been getting while shooting further out. This is a big error % wise given its only @ 6MOA of elevation.

    I guess my question is are there any cheap scopes out there that track 100% on or is this pretty par for the coarse?
    Dago likes this.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,093
    depends what you call cheap, i have a bsa phantom on one of my rugers and it stays true and groups damn well, also great in lowlight

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Godzone, South Island
    Posts
    1,705
    I would say thats pretty bloody good! May not be exactly as dialled, but you are well on the way to knowing what your rifle/scope combo can do. keep the info and just dial accordingly. I have one of those big ass Konus scopes for my sons 17HMR, thought it would be a good cheap option just for playing around. Turns out it tracks and dials very consistently, a very underrated scope.

  4. #4
    Member andyanimal31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Makakahi road Raetihi
    Posts
    3,464
    A generalization is that with optics you get what you pay for.
    Theres always a compromise somewhere.

    Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
    BRADS likes this.
    My favorite sentences i like to hear are - I suppose so. and Send It!

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Palmerston North
    Posts
    90
    My Bushnell AR4.5-18 (relatively cheap scope) is readily repeatable and returns to zero well. The only hitch with it was that each click is worth 0.31MOA. Easy enough to place into my ballistic app to allow for the correct correction though.

  6. #6
    Member janleroux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    439
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt-P.Nth View Post
    My Bushnell AR4.5-18 (relatively cheap scope) is readily repeatable and returns to zero well. The only hitch with it was that each click is worth 0.31MOA. Easy enough to place into my ballistic app to allow for the correct correction though.
    Up to what range can you get out of it?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    What you see, is what you get!

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Palmerston North
    Posts
    90
    I’ve only taken it to 450yd with my 308 (the point I run under 1000ft/lbs) which is about 50in of drop (8MOA). When I’m home tomorrow I’ll have a play with it and see how much more MOA of play there is.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    1,934
    Here's a report I did on my $200 leapers scope.

    https://www.nzhuntingandshooting.co....st-fire-28359/

    It has about 15% over adjustment in elevation.

  9. #9
    A Better Lover Than A Shooter Ultimitsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Less than 130 km from the sea
    Posts
    622

  10. #10
    Member suthy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    North Canterbury
    Posts
    244
    @Bagheera Awesome review and cool little scope! I might do a similar test to yours, looks like a good way to get better % errors. Thanks for sharing.

  11. #11
    Member suthy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    North Canterbury
    Posts
    244
    @Ultimitsu Another great review and that looks like great value. I'm not sure I'd want to try bring one in atm though!

  12. #12
    Member suthy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    North Canterbury
    Posts
    244
    It looks like the Panamax might not be doing to bad and need to learn corrections for the error. Cheers guys

  13. #13
    Member suthy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    North Canterbury
    Posts
    244
    Actually one last thing. The Panamax has a half mildot reticle and I set up target with 10mm square @ 50m to see what magnification it would be spot on @ and to my surprise, it would need @ least 1x or 2x more power to get it to work.

    I suppose this is pretty common as well?

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Marlborough
    Posts
    816
    Quote Originally Posted by suthy View Post
    Actually one last thing. The Panamax has a half mildot reticle and I set up target with 10mm square @ 50m to see what magnification it would be spot on @ and to my surprise, it would need @ least 1x or 2x more power to get it to work.

    I suppose this is pretty common as well?
    Panamax mildot reticle is calibrated for 10X. So you're right, you need 1X more power.

  15. #15
    Member Marty Henry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tararua
    Posts
    6,632
    It seems to be pretty common even on more expensive scopes for ajustments to be not quite the 1/4moa per click. Some of this may be due to weak detents meaning you add an extra one when winding on or possibly the fact that the milling needs to be accurate to within a thou or so. My sightron does .3 per click and a vx2 .2. If you know then its all good no matter what it shifts as long as its consistent.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Which of the cheap scopes is the crapiest?
    By fetchfire in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 22-02-2015, 03:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!