Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

ZeroPak DPT


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32
Like Tree21Likes

Thread: Is leaning into your bipod a myth?

  1. #1
    Member Dead is better's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    976

    Is leaning into your bipod a myth?

    Always looking to stir the pot, i put this idea out there. I believe leaning into your bipod is counter productive. Here's the evidence.
    A - Leaning slightly into it as certain shooting dvds say you should.
    Name:  Screenshot_20200322-105813_Samsung Internet.jpg
Views: 787
Size:  349.4 KB
    B - Just letting the bipod sit vertical
    Name:  Screenshot_20200322-132648_Samsung Internet.jpg
Views: 822
Size:  332.7 KB

    What say you? Anybody else had similar results
    199p likes this.

  2. #2
    Member 199p's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Palmerston North
    Posts
    4,108
    A lot of this will be relative to
    Rifle especially bedding , floated barrel and caliber
    bipod brand / style
    Surface the bipod is on eg concrete, grass etc
    Shooter if they can lean in the same amount everytime

    Ive had some rifles they didn't like any pressure and others that shot much better with it loaded and others that shot the same regardless

    Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
    BRADS, DBL and mimms2 like this.
    Konus binoculars " The power to imagine"

  3. #3
    Caretaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    8,841
    When testing at the range - find what works best

    When hunting do EXACTLY the same thing that worked best
    199p, R93, mikee and 1 others like this.
    A big fast bullet beats a little fast bullet every time

  4. #4
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    8,935
    I don't recommend "leaning into it" so much as prefer a bipod that has some "play" forward/back in the legs that can be lightly pushed forward, then has some freedom to move backward through recoil without legs jumping, meaning you can keep position and self-spot more easily or shoot again, with a strong position behind the rifle. There's no reason there would be an accuracy advantage (presuming everything is done equally consistently)
    Dead is better likes this.

  5. #5
    Member stagstalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    North Island, New Zealand
    Posts
    2,130
    In certain applications I think it is more effective. For example a few weeks ago when applying the technique I use for my hunting rifles (everything is neutral) I could not get on target at 1300m with the suppressed 338. When I loaded the bipod and absorbed the recoil better I was able to get on target.

    I don’t find it necessary for my hunting rifles at those shorter distances though. Too one dimensional, what if I have to shoot off a rock or a tree etc? Instead I use a neutral style where the bipod is not loaded and just recoils into my shoulder the same way it would over a pack, off a tree, standing etc.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    South Otago
    Posts
    3,834
    Use my bipod only on paddock surface and resting on my backpack when sighting in, will try the bipod on the concrete bench next time on the range to test the theory. ( talking 22 rimfire here)

    I use a styrene block to support the fore end on the 222 and 7.62x39, don’t hold the rifle tight when sighting in. (But that’s got nowt to do with the topic!)

  7. #7
    R93
    R93 is offline
    Member R93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Westland NZ
    Posts
    16,102
    I was trained in the military to lean in on a bipod but have had way better results with my rifles with free recoil since.
    Just personal preference. However I seem to get the same poi on any surface.


    Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk
    Dead is better and dannyb like this.
    Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.

  8. #8
    Unapologetic gun slut dannyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Oxford, North Canterbury
    Posts
    8,558
    Quote Originally Posted by R93 View Post
    I was trained in the military to lean in on a bipod but have had way better results with my rifles with free recoil since.
    Just personal preference. However I seem to get the same poi on any surface.


    Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk
    this ^^^^^^^ I find no POI shift between loaded or un loaded but I find shooting loaded up slightly more comfortable for my shooting style but I am confident shooting it un loaded too if needed depending on the situation
    270 WSM carbon fiber ultra light rifle with a muzzle brake fitted

  9. #9
    Member GravelBen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Gorrre
    Posts
    3,600
    A lot of (especially cheaper) rifles seem to have too much flex in the stock for consistency if you lean into a bipod, especially on rough surfaces where you can easily end up with a different amount of force on each leg.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Invervegas
    Posts
    4,570
    Both my target rifles (an Omark 223 and a Lithgow LA102 308) like to be loaded on the Harris bipod, but as others have mentioned consistency is the key. If I had a specialized "F Class" bipod I'd shoot them free.

    As a range officer one thing I see a lot is folks using the "lie at an angle" body position whereas most current trainers seem to prefer "straight behind the line of sight" position, and I've certainly shot better this way since I "retrained" myself. You can test this easily - does the rifle fall back to point of aim after the shot, with you being able to see the "trace" if atmospherics render it visible.

    On the hill with hunting rifles, all bets are off. I've just been away with some folks shooting wallabies, in terrain where about only one in ten shots might have allowed the use of a bipod - so if you haven't practised your sitting, crooked uphill prone, etc etc you're going to have misses - we all did!!.
    Pengy likes this.

  11. #11
    Terminator Products Kiwi Greg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    6,527
    It really depends on the stock & how much clearance around the barrel it has, combined with recoil

    Some really like having a little bit of pre-load & some really really don't

    It is quite surprising how much fore-end flex some "proper" imported carbon stocks have

  12. #12
    ebf
    ebf is offline
    Mushroom juice ! Hic ! ebf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Above the Hutt
    Posts
    6,872
    Interesting thread

    For all my hunting and gong rifles I tend to load the bipod. Not heavy pressure, just enough to slightly rock it forward.

    Depends a lot on how rigid the stock is etc. A lot of it also is caliber and specifically projectile weight dependant. With FTR rifles (much heavier than avg hunting rig), we found 185gr was about the limit. Around 200gr and up in a 308, recoil management gets VERY hard.
    Viva la Howa ! R.I.P. Toby | Black rifles matter... | #illegitimate_ute

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Jafa land
    Posts
    5,331
    For what it's worth there was a really good long range shooter that came to my nzda and his method of shooting with a bipod was to load it up so that you didn't need to support the butt or grip with a hand. Enough pressure to keep it on your shoulder.

    Seemed to work out for him.

  14. #14
    Member Flyblown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    3,244
    For medium range pest goat & deer shooting (6.5, out to 600m+) I will alter the setup to achieve the same outcome, so more or less pressure. I usually hold the forend, but sometimes don’t, and it also depends on what rifle I am shooting. The end result is what counts, which for me is an easily controllable, dead steady reticle that I can comfortably adjust for windage hold. Mostly I try and concentrate on how I am lying, and the angle of my head / neck / torso w.r.t. the rifle.
    Just...say...the...word

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    kaiapoi
    Posts
    6,733
    20+ years ago got to know a guy with a 338 win mag. He had a bunch of different firearms (all different sizes-wasn't just a magnum nut), got a lot of deer and was a pretty good shot on the clays too.
    Anyway he used to shoot the 338 prone on a bipod but went through 2 stocks. they were splitting up the front. Went to a synthetic and problem solved but ultimately Could've got away with a wooden one in the end as he got his missus to video him shooting it. He did the slow-mo thing and you could sees wicked ripple going through his back. Didn't do prone shooting after that unless he had too

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Vortex/Hornady bullet cam myth or reality?
    By FRST in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-04-2017, 07:56 PM
  2. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 28-11-2015, 02:48 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!