Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT Alpine


User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 17
Like Tree24Likes

Thread: A Poor Man's Rangefinder

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    2,753

    A Poor Man's Rangefinder

    Greetings All,
    The title of this thread is a little misleading as it does include those that can't be bothered with a range finder.
    @mickyDuck regularly informs us of the benefits of zeroing our rifles to achieve a maximum point blank range and I must say that I am with him on that one. The difficulty is how we know when that far is too far. As mentioned in @Taco thread most of my rifles are zeroed at 200 metre. Additionally most scopes are fixed power and have some sort of hold over reticle. My recent hunting has been extremely limited so the need for any shots at range, any range has been non existent so when a friend dropped by yesterday it was a good time to put some thoughts to the test.
    The rifle is his Ruger 6.5 x 55 with a short barrel and a Leupold 3-9 scope with the standard duplex reticle zeroed dead on at 200 metres. I had mentioned the possibility of using the scope reticule as a rough guide to range previously so after the usual cuppa and a catch up we dragged the deer target (chest depth 450mm) out of the shed and leant it against a gate in the main paddock. My friend usually carries his rifle with the scope set on 4 power the deer's chest filled the reticule point to point at 100 metres and also at 200 metres with the scope set on 9 power. Snap. A quick check showed that the deer's chest took up the cross hair to point at 100 metres with the scope set on 9 power.
    So there we have it a simple way to tell if that far is too far without a range finder. This is not new. The pamphlet that came with my old Tasco (printed 1973) had similar suggestions using the length of a Whitetail deer body. Deer in NZ however don't stand broadside on in the open much so body depth is a better measure. I also hear you say deer do not come in standard sizes. True but a smaller deer will be closer and a bigger deer will have more margin for error.
    Out of interest I crunched the numbers for my old Tasco and a standard deer chest will fit between the points of its reticle at a little under 200 metres.
    Your reticule may differ and remember that second focal plane scopes must be set on the same power to get the same results. Dead easy with my fixed power scopes.
    Regards Grandpamac.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Does Leica rangefinder 2400r or bino/rangefinder 2700r display angle degrees?
    By Rem260 in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 27-11-2020, 09:13 PM
  2. Poor Man's AR
    By Tahr in forum The Magazine
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 20-12-2017, 09:54 PM
  3. those poor poms
    By gsp follower in forum Game Bird Hunting
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 19-10-2015, 01:53 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!