Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Darkness Terminator


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 93
Like Tree65Likes

Thread: ARMS OFFICE NEWSLETTER WAIKATO DISTRICT

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    21,392
    Quote Originally Posted by Beavis View Post
    I think it is policy to revoke endorsements if you cannot demonstrate an immediate need for it
    I think your right, there seems to be an underlying intention to reduce licences or downgrade cats.

  2. #2
    P38
    P38 is offline
    Member P38's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hastings
    Posts
    5,692
    Quote Originally Posted by Maca49 View Post
    I think your right, there seems to be an underlying intention to reduce licences or downgrade cats.
    I agree Maca.

    Surrender by stealth.

    I've had an E endorsement since they were invented and every relicencing since then I have been asked in a subtle way to surrender it along with my C.
    The conversation usually goes along the lines of "I dont appear to be using these endorsements much so don't really need them do I" with comments like it's "Something to consider" then you won't have to have higher security costs or you could sell those firearms for a good price and use the money for a holiday or something etc.

    The inspectors around here are all ex detectives and are all quite good but they also know what they're doing when they ask these questions, they may catch you at a weak moment or even sway your better judgement on the spur of the moment and with one stroke of their pen your endorsement/s, your legal right if judged a fit and proper person, is gone.... maybe for good.

    My standard response is "No thanks I'll be keeping these" end of story.

    I have also been asked each time to supply a list of all my non endorsed firearms for Police to hold on my behalf for "Insurance purposes" which I believe is just another way of obtaining information by stealth that the Police are not currently entitled to.
    I always politely decline by saying my insuranced company already has this information.

    Cheers
    Pete
    Last edited by P38; 15-06-2013 at 11:04 AM.
    Maca49 and Scouser like this.

  3. #3
    Member Beavis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    4,971
    Quote Originally Posted by P38 View Post
    I agree Maca.

    Surrender by stealth.

    I've had an E endorsement since they were invented and every relicencing since then I have been asked in a subtle way to surrender it along with my C.
    The conversation usually goes along the lines of "I dont appear to be using these endorsements much so don't really need them do I" with comments like it's "Something to consider" then you won't have to have higher security costs or you could sell those firearms for a good price and use the money for a holiday or something etc.

    The inspectors around here are all ex detectives and are all quite good but they also know what they're doing when they ask these questions, they may catch you at a weak moment or even sway your better judgement on the spur of the moment and with one stroke of their pen your endorsement/s, your legal right if judged a fit and proper person, is gone.... maybe for good.

    My standard response is "No thanks I'll be keeping these" end of story.

    I have also been asked each time to supply a list of all my non endorsed firearms for Police to hold on my behalf for "Insurance purposes" which I believe is just another way of obtaining information by stealth that the Police are not currently entitled to.
    I always politely decline by saying my insuranced company already has this information.

    Cheers
    Pete
    That just makes me pissed. Why not be straight up with somebody than beat around the bush with clever wording. Interviewing you like you're a criminal, great. My AO has voiced his distaste for semi autos to me, but at least he is straight up and knows what he is an is not able to do under the law. He's great to deal with. I really feel for you guys who have to put up with all the bullshit from vetting officers and AO's who just can't keep their beak out of your rightful business.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    21,392
    Quote Originally Posted by Beavis View Post
    That just makes me pissed. Why not be straight up with somebody than beat around the bush with clever wording. Interviewing you like you're a criminal, great. My AO has voiced his distaste for semi autos to me, but at least he is straight up and knows what he is an is not able to do under the law. He's great to deal with. I really feel for you guys who have to put up with all the bullshit from vetting officers and AO's who just can't keep their beak out of your rightful business.
    They way to really stuff them up would be for everyone on this forum to apply for a C cat, problem would be cost, but if I did apply I don't see how it could be refused based on my life long interest alone. I'll think about that.
    Boom, cough,cough,cough

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Hard but productive night at the office
    By burtonator in forum The Magazine
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-12-2012, 09:37 AM
  2. Photo's of my office
    By Philipo in forum Photography and Video
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 04-09-2012, 02:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!