Thread: camo in the bush

Legally the shooter would have been responsible if he had shot the other hunter. From what I can make out he IDENTIFIED the target and CHECKED the firing zone. How the fuck would he know if the camo clad hunter would have been there after taking the two above steps....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by tiroatedson

Legally the shooter would have been responsible if he had shot the other hunter. From what I can make out he IDENTIFIED the target and CHECKED the firing zone. How the fuck would he know if the camo clad hunter would have been there after taking the two above steps....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Second that comment. Rules 4 & 5 were observed. Why the hell would anyone go full camo in NZ bush? There were no other hints that there was any one else in the vicinity. However, had the guy been hit and survived, the shooter would have been before the courts for sure. This is why I never wear anything like camo when I'm bushing. Also, after the first shot, had I been the camo guy, I would have made my presence known for sure.