Thread: Gunsmithing under threat?

Yeah been noted before that you could go round and round in circles quite lawfully. One wag cynically noted that this must be the criminal ownership loophole...

Let's be honest here.
It isn't realistic and shouldn't be allowed, but with the muppets in charge who the hell would know what they are up ho.
I'm sure they would like to enforce this to shut people out with no other logic to back it up

BULLSHIT! Next the FSA will be telling farmers that they are only allowed one cow! BULLSHIT!

Originally Posted by Hugh Shields

BULLSHIT! Next the FSA will be telling farmers that they are only allowed one cow! BULLSHIT!

Its only bullshit if true.
So far its 3 pages of conjecture based on an "I heard".

Woods223 is on to it. Go ask them.

Originally Posted by Tahr

Its only bullshit if true.
So far its 3 pages of conjecture based on an "I heard".

Woods223 is on to it. Go ask them.

Three pages?
Mate that must be tedious having to go to next page after every 15 posts of spurious conjecture, go into settings and change it to 40 posts per page.
Click settings top right of web page, then general settings on left. Then scroll down to this:

FSA funny stuff alright

Thanks @Makros better late than never. It was a mission reading 2000+ pages in the jokes thread when I joined the forum.

Originally Posted by No good names left

Thanks @Makros better late than never. It was a mission reading 2000+ pages in the jokes thread when I joined the forum.

But well worth it

Originally Posted by 7mmsaum

But well worth it

Hear hear.......That thread must be some sort of record.....Most pages / longest time and still essentially On topic....it has drifted occasionally but has always come back to the original topic.....40,000 posts on one thread.....Damn!!!

I couldn't find anything on the FSA site but herein lies the problem, we are now dealing with Bureaucrats who will have myriad interpretations of already confusing FSA interpretations of Legislation. As I have said they are duplicitous. Note the clause(s) left out of the Fit & Proper Definition on the website as opposed to what came out of Parliament as an example.

Greetings All,
We are now fast approaching 40 posts and not one shred of evidence has appeared to support the OP. It seems to me that there is none and the classification of BS is appropriate.
GPM.

True - but it has filled in an otherwise dreary winters weekend so not totally a loss.

Originally Posted by Fee Knicks

True - but it has filled in an otherwise dreary winters weekend so not totally a loss.

As long as it hasn't dragged you away from housework, Fee Knicks..

And it stayed on topic

and woods223 is getting us some awnsers hopefully