Thread: New Updated Arms Code 2017

Originally Posted by Sidney

making excuses for oneself does not amount to a conspiracy...

i'm not claiming system infallibility, i'm claiming lack of capacity to form intent..

now people on the other hand have the ability to conspire, but given the context of legality in which this discussion is based the only definition that is appropriate is a legal one.

Conspiracy = conversations, with intent to commit a crime are the requirement, and action that amounts to more than mere preparation..

policy discussions, strategising to change the law, to make excuses for performance does not meet the standard

neither does employing knobs as arms officers

neither does producing incompetant policy documents that are not law..

I'm not talking about your narrow 'conspiracy to break the law'. As I said I'm using the wider conspiracy, making secret plans, which is obviously true and 300% fits that criteria. It is obvious that PNHQ have come up with a dream list of wants as far as firearms are concerned. That list is not one that has been derived by talking to licensed firearm owners or dealers, or other interested parties, and they seem hell bent on trying to implement that list by hook or by crook. They have been caught subliminally trying to do it by crook so have simply pulled out that little trump card they've been given.

Not sure the intent of giving them that card was this, but hey they've got it.