Thread: New Updated Arms Code 2017

Originally Posted by Sidney

its not narrow fella its accurate

I am not interested in your pop culture, chicken little interpretation when discussing legal issues... and this is a legal issue... the issue is clearly whether or not it is lawful for the police to formulate policy about their areas of responsiblity and plainly it is. Policy meetings are always private, so that component is irelevant...

you want to talk about the nasty little policemen wanting to take away our guns as having an agenda... fine...

you want to argue that they are not entitled to have political interests... fine as well, but damm that will be difficult cause they can just hide behind health and safety for that..

its just not a conspiracy.... full bloody stop ... it may be a policy.......

and by the way.... we would have to go to court to resolve the argument, so I am pretty sure which way the decision would go there.....

con·spir·a·cy (kən-spîr′ə-sē)
n. pl. con·spir·a·cies
1. An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.
2. A group of conspirators.
3. Law An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action.
4. A joining or acting together, as if by sinister design: a conspiracy of wind and tide that devastated coastal areas.

You may want to work on your comprehension skills. I did not say the action was illegal. I did say there was a conspiracy and what you have said backs that wider definition perfectly. It is not illegal to conspire. Hey, the all blacks coaches could conspire with the lions coaches to conspire a plan to defeat the Aussies. Wow, who'd have thought it?



Taken to court the Police would likely win, unless the intent of the law change they are using could be shown to not be followed.