Thread: New Updated Arms Code 2017

By the way you only think that it requires an expert in the legal field because that is where you are trying to shift it. But that is not where it belongs. Accept it.

no, not if you get it right... you quite entitled to get it right, if you keep getting it right eventually you become an expert, if you don't you should probably learn to rely on one more often. Arguing that a meaning of a word, that use isn't appropriate in the context that it is being can be used or that doesn't meet the expections of those reading it in that context, is simply misapplication. Nobody said it couldn't be used in different ways in more applicable contexts.

But you are not off to a good start so far. what lawyers are trained to do is to interpret and apply, words, words in context and the intention of where and how they are used. Its a general level of competance that has application in business, education, politics and in all other areas of society . Short of specific study of language, lawyers are one of the few groups that are trained in this area. Narrow area of study, what in the opinion of an engineer?? youre fricken hilarious...

this sort of illustrates your comphrehension problems...

in so far as pedantic wankery is concerned, you could assume that smarter people might know when to not engage with experts in it.....
And innuendo like this is the adult form of snivelling. It is not becoming of you. Please pick yourself up, blow your nose, open the curtains and look at the big wide world out there. Put your books down more often and get out there and enjoy it.

let me spell this one out for you...

I am a pedantic wanker, I consider myself an expert in it. If you were smart you would avoid tangling with the pedantic wanker.....

its called self deprecation fella... and its clear to me why you don't get this argument, you can't work stuff out...

by the way, you are still tangling with me...