free-standing grip, in relation to a firearm, means a grip that,—
(a)is designed to be gripped by the whole or most of the trigger hand of a person firing the firearm;
free-standing grip, in relation to a firearm, means a grip that,—
(a)is designed to be gripped by the whole or most of the trigger hand of a person firing the firearm;
"Second grip forward of the trigger" was put forward as a MSSA feature as part of the 2009 'reinterpretation' by Police of what constituted a pistol grip, but this interpretation was overturned in court and has subsequently been subject to updated legislation. Forward/second grip doesn't feature in the current definition of a MSSA. I believe whoever told you that your bipod/handgrip makes your rifle e-cat is wrong.
^ what he said.
Was part of the interpretation, isn't now.
Was it an RO who talked about this or just another shooter ? RO should've known better, and another shooter just hates being told that they're wrong :D
Yes it is basic, it's only difficult if you choose to make it so. All law is open to interpretation.
Police need to be able to show an offence has been committed, if you have a perfectly legitimate reason for owning the magazine then it is a defence. Having the magazine between the two guns in your example is not an offence.
RO Told me that if I didn't have an e cat he would have asked me to stop shooting it or remove it. I didn't think he was correct but didn't know enough to tell him he was wrong.
Yeah it was at riverhead. You are right. It just isnt worth the argument. I find most of them are pretty good guys but there is a guy there who is on a serious power trip.
He doesnt bother me as I try to follow the rules as much as possible but man you should hear him tell his story about being a right to have a gun licence in NZ and for continuing the tradition of shooting. It is Full on. Would love to record it.
Very moving :)
Yeah it's morons like that, that give RO's a bad name. Not every RO is a wanker - contrary to popular belief ;)
Personally don't have a lot of time for people like that, Riverhead seems to attract more than most other ranges I've been at. RO's duty is ensure safety for everyone, including new and old shooters. Mind you, that's probably worthy of a very long winded and detailed thread somewhere else.....
Or to a judge... A 10rd AR15 mag is a MSSA part according to customs.. And importing one with a permit prior to it hitting the nz border is an offence.
And then you spend 2 yrs backwards and forwards to court until you finally run out of money for the lawyer or give up....
This guy is certainly comfortable with it ;)
Ruger 10/22 | Trade Me
Going back to the original questions re AR mags that fit into non-semi auto rifles and owning an A cat rifle that it will fit. There is a simple way to solve this if you want to own both. You simply alter the fit of the magazine like Izhmash did with the Saiga. You can do one of two things: Add a small lump / lug to the semi auto rifle that blocks the magazine from fitting then adjust you semi auto mags so that only they fit. This way you can use your 7 shot semi mags in you pump / bolt or waht ever action you have, but the Hi cap ones will only fit the non semi auto and will not engage the semi.
If you can show that in its current form the magazine will not function in the semi but will fit into the non-semi then you should have no problems. Thus if you have a Saiga then the AK Hi cap mags will not fit without it being altered to accommodate them.
...I know the RO you talk about above, met him many times (its pretty easy from your description).
He is not a bad bloke and is normally a very accomodating and helpful chap.
Maybe on the occasion you mention above it was a long day, or he hoped out of bed the wrong way, or he just got too excited...
I even had someone try to tell me that my 1916 P14 was an 'e' category rifle lol. It has a bayonet lug but it is bolt action. It isn't self loading like the law states.