Thread: Support for tighter Acat storage

Originally Posted by Cordite

Hunt4Life, thanks for bringing this case to our attention. Some points.

1. Too early to say, "luckily it didn't", don't you think?

2. Minimum A-cat security requirement by law is "sturdy construction". How does this case demonstrate the law should be tightened?

Simply because the AO had approved the cabinet as compliant ie. of sturdy construction. Yet one solid strike with a mallet proved it wasn't so sturdy. Interpretation seems to be a common theme.

I agree the primary focus should be on significantly harsher penalties for burglary and particularly when caught with illegal possession of firearms.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk