I acquired this new un-fired vintage Tikka M55 in .243. I believe it was manufactured somewhere between 1975 & 1979. Interesting rifle. Made when Tikka was independent of Sako. No plastic anywhere...
Liked On: 08-04-2020, 07:41 PM
Iv never personally chrono'd it, but iv heard some reports (at least in 270 calibre) that it chrono'd low. Ill have to chrono some. Remmodel7 there are no 7-08 in that bin, but Sako made a 7mm-08...
Liked On: 08-04-2020, 01:32 PM
I dont shoot much if any factory ammo for personal usage, but id be pretty content with some of the Sako Factory Ammo. Especially if you own a Sako or Tikka Rifle. Over the last few months I must...
Liked On: 08-04-2020, 11:54 AM
I dont shoot much if any factory ammo for personal usage, but id be pretty content with some of the Sako Factory Ammo. Especially if you own a Sako or Tikka Rifle. Over the last few months I must...
Liked On: 08-04-2020, 11:48 AM
I acquired this new un-fired vintage Tikka M55 in .243. I believe it was manufactured somewhere between 1975 & 1979. Interesting rifle. Made when Tikka was independent of Sako. No plastic anywhere...
Liked On: 08-04-2020, 08:58 AM
I acquired this new un-fired vintage Tikka M55 in .243. I believe it was manufactured somewhere between 1975 & 1979. Interesting rifle. Made when Tikka was independent of Sako. No plastic anywhere...
Liked On: 07-04-2020, 07:22 PM
I acquired this new un-fired vintage Tikka M55 in .243. I believe it was manufactured somewhere between 1975 & 1979. Interesting rifle. Made when Tikka was independent of Sako. No plastic anywhere...
Liked On: 07-04-2020, 06:08 PM
I think the quality of the barrel, overall stiffness of the stock, and a well designed bedding method are significant factors in producing accurate rifles. Then a good trigger helps the average Joe...
Liked On: 09-03-2020, 04:50 PM
Whats it doing at 100 - 150m? What does the lowest setting on the rear sight say? Im not familiar with that rifle or what sights its equipped with, but many old milsurps have a minimum zero distance...
Liked On: 09-03-2020, 10:24 AM
Aluminium is generally softer than steel. We are talking about clamping something soft (aluminium rings) to something hard (steel receiver). There are many possible variables, but the gist of it...
Liked On: 07-03-2020, 09:17 AM
Aluminium is generally softer than steel. We are talking about clamping something soft (aluminium rings) to something hard (steel receiver). There are many possible variables, but the gist of it...
Liked On: 06-03-2020, 07:38 PM
Aluminium is generally softer than steel. We are talking about clamping something soft (aluminium rings) to something hard (steel receiver). There are many possible variables, but the gist of it...
Liked On: 06-03-2020, 02:06 PM
Aluminium is generally softer than steel. We are talking about clamping something soft (aluminium rings) to something hard (steel receiver). There are many possible variables, but the gist of it...
Liked On: 05-03-2020, 08:00 PM
Well, I believe the gunsmith is in the clear. The marks on the brass are caused by imperfections in the chamber - which must have been there from the factory. There is no way for that damage to...
Liked On: 05-03-2020, 07:57 PM
Aluminium is generally softer than steel. We are talking about clamping something soft (aluminium rings) to something hard (steel receiver). There are many possible variables, but the gist of it...
Liked On: 05-03-2020, 05:07 PM