Probably not
Liked On: 26-07-2014, 11:23 PM
I agree Ditch the scope, teach him to shoot properly with irons.
Liked On: 26-07-2014, 10:16 PM
Man the random capitalisation has got TO stop
Liked On: 26-07-2014, 05:20 PM
Man the random capitalisation has got TO stop
Liked On: 26-07-2014, 05:11 PM
Man the random capitalisation has got TO stop
Liked On: 26-07-2014, 02:27 PM
Man the random capitalisation has got TO stop
Liked On: 26-07-2014, 02:06 PM
Irons?
Liked On: 24-07-2014, 08:08 PM
You can have a mag that appears to hold 10, as long as it only holds 7. "Appears to hold" is a hilariously stupid subjective metric
Liked On: 22-07-2014, 09:25 PM
get a .308, then you won't be able to spot the holes at all (because you will have missed)
Liked On: 19-07-2014, 09:25 PM
fuckin lol where's the legislative requirement for an "engineering report" to put a different stock on a barrelled action?? what a crock illegal MSSA maybe but that's shite
Liked On: 17-07-2014, 11:07 PM
Blame the wind and build a bigger wildcat
Liked On: 13-07-2014, 12:51 PM
Problem found!! Natural point of aim = rifle naturally resting with point of aim on the target, when in shooting position. No muscle required to be on target. Bipod spikes allow too much...
Liked On: 13-07-2014, 12:50 PM
As these 2 groups were shot with different rear rests, I would suggest throwing the rear monopod in the bin and shooting again, with the rear bag, concentrating on your basics.
Liked On: 13-07-2014, 12:47 PM
get a .308, then you won't be able to spot the holes at all (because you will have missed)
Liked On: 10-07-2014, 08:50 AM
get a .308, then you won't be able to spot the holes at all (because you will have missed)
Liked On: 10-07-2014, 08:29 AM