Greetings All, In another thread I talked about my simple methods for validating load data. The cartridge was the .260 Rem with the 140 grain plus projectiles and AR2209 powder. I have started a new...
Liked On: 23-03-2024, 10:48 PM
Greetings. After reading Grey Kiwi's post recommending the .30-30 it crossed my mind that the .308 can easily be downloaded with AR2206H to .30-30 velocity. Only a Lee Loader and perhaps a hand...
Liked On: 23-03-2024, 07:13 PM
Greetings. After reading Grey Kiwi's post recommending the .30-30 it crossed my mind that the .308 can easily be downloaded with AR2206H to .30-30 velocity. Only a Lee Loader and perhaps a hand...
Liked On: 23-03-2024, 07:00 PM
Greetings, I suggest you repeat the test with a better aiming mark. A hollow square or circle that you can quarter with your cross hairs will work a lot better. Also consider zeroing at 200 metres....
Liked On: 23-03-2024, 11:36 AM
Greetings All, In another thread I talked about my simple methods for validating load data. The cartridge was the .260 Rem with the 140 grain plus projectiles and AR2209 powder. I have started a new...
Liked On: 22-03-2024, 12:35 PM
Greetings All, In another thread I talked about my simple methods for validating load data. The cartridge was the .260 Rem with the 140 grain plus projectiles and AR2209 powder. I have started a new...
Liked On: 22-03-2024, 12:23 PM
Greetings, Get the 7mm-08. Much less drama to load for and more than adequate for 350 metres. Any of the other cartridges of that capacity from the 6.5's up to the .308 would be just as good. GPM.
Liked On: 20-03-2024, 10:55 PM
Greetings STC, It is not the projectile but is the powder speed increasing. I ran a test a few years back using the three lots of AR2209 in my 6.5x55. The projectile was the 129 rain SST in Lapua...
Liked On: 20-03-2024, 10:49 PM
Greetings, Get the 7mm-08. Much less drama to load for and more than adequate for 350 metres. Any of the other cartridges of that capacity from the 6.5's up to the .308 would be just as good. GPM.
Liked On: 20-03-2024, 07:50 PM
Greetings, Get the 7mm-08. Much less drama to load for and more than adequate for 350 metres. Any of the other cartridges of that capacity from the 6.5's up to the .308 would be just as good. GPM.
Liked On: 20-03-2024, 06:57 PM
Greetings, Get the 7mm-08. Much less drama to load for and more than adequate for 350 metres. Any of the other cartridges of that capacity from the 6.5's up to the .308 would be just as good. GPM.
Liked On: 20-03-2024, 12:04 PM
Greetings, Get the 7mm-08. Much less drama to load for and more than adequate for 350 metres. Any of the other cartridges of that capacity from the 6.5's up to the .308 would be just as good. GPM.
Liked On: 20-03-2024, 10:18 AM
Greetings, Get the 7mm-08. Much less drama to load for and more than adequate for 350 metres. Any of the other cartridges of that capacity from the 6.5's up to the .308 would be just as good. GPM.
Liked On: 20-03-2024, 09:40 AM
Greetings All, In another thread I talked about my simple methods for validating load data. The cartridge was the .260 Rem with the 140 grain plus projectiles and AR2209 powder. I have started a new...
Liked On: 20-03-2024, 08:56 AM
Greetings STC, It is not the projectile but is the powder speed increasing. I ran a test a few years back using the three lots of AR2209 in my 6.5x55. The projectile was the 129 rain SST in Lapua...
Liked On: 20-03-2024, 08:55 AM