I made exactly that point in my submission. The setting of fees is to be paid by those using the service ('the beneficiaries'). The stated aim of the new Arms Act nonsense is 'public safety'...
Liked On: 20-03-2023, 09:15 PM
I made exactly that point in my submission. The setting of fees is to be paid by those using the service ('the beneficiaries'). The stated aim of the new Arms Act nonsense is 'public safety'...
Liked On: 20-03-2023, 07:28 PM
That's rich coming from one whose whole existence relies on sucking from the public tit! He is an evil little parasite!
Liked On: 20-03-2023, 01:58 PM
That's rich coming from one whose whole existence relies on sucking from the public tit! He is an evil little parasite!
Liked On: 20-03-2023, 11:56 AM
I made exactly that point in my submission. The setting of fees is to be paid by those using the service ('the beneficiaries'). The stated aim of the new Arms Act nonsense is 'public safety'...
Liked On: 20-03-2023, 11:56 AM
That's rich coming from one whose whole existence relies on sucking from the public tit! He is an evil little parasite!
Liked On: 20-03-2023, 11:17 AM
That's rich coming from one whose whole existence relies on sucking from the public tit! He is an evil little parasite!
Liked On: 20-03-2023, 12:49 AM
I made exactly that point in my submission. The setting of fees is to be paid by those using the service ('the beneficiaries'). The stated aim of the new Arms Act nonsense is 'public safety'...
Liked On: 20-03-2023, 12:49 AM
That's rich coming from one whose whole existence relies on sucking from the public tit! He is an evil little parasite!
Liked On: 19-03-2023, 05:14 PM
I made exactly that point in my submission. The setting of fees is to be paid by those using the service ('the beneficiaries'). The stated aim of the new Arms Act nonsense is 'public safety'...
Liked On: 19-03-2023, 05:10 PM
That's rich coming from one whose whole existence relies on sucking from the public tit! He is an evil little parasite!
Liked On: 19-03-2023, 03:32 PM
I made exactly that point in my submission. The setting of fees is to be paid by those using the service ('the beneficiaries'). The stated aim of the new Arms Act nonsense is 'public safety'...
Liked On: 19-03-2023, 03:32 PM
I made exactly that point in my submission. The setting of fees is to be paid by those using the service ('the beneficiaries'). The stated aim of the new Arms Act nonsense is 'public safety'...
Liked On: 19-03-2023, 03:29 PM
I made exactly that point in my submission. The setting of fees is to be paid by those using the service ('the beneficiaries'). The stated aim of the new Arms Act nonsense is 'public safety'...
Liked On: 19-03-2023, 03:17 PM
I made exactly that point in my submission. The setting of fees is to be paid by those using the service ('the beneficiaries'). The stated aim of the new Arms Act nonsense is 'public safety'...
Liked On: 19-03-2023, 02:59 PM