390 yard with a .223 is pretty impressive regardless of the projectile. the image shows plenty of tissue damage. this sort of performance certainly cast doubt over the old theory that a clean kill on...
Liked On: 07-02-2025, 09:29 PM
Yep agreed. 10 years ago you wouldn't see me dead using a .223 on Deer. Now I do it regularly and although I sometime look at that tiny wee cartridge and wonder if it really will do the job, it...
Liked On: 07-02-2025, 12:38 PM
390 yard with a .223 is pretty impressive regardless of the projectile. the image shows plenty of tissue damage. this sort of performance certainly cast doubt over the old theory that a clean kill on...
Liked On: 07-02-2025, 12:26 PM
390 yard with a .223 is pretty impressive regardless of the projectile. the image shows plenty of tissue damage. this sort of performance certainly cast doubt over the old theory that a clean kill on...
Liked On: 07-02-2025, 11:34 AM
390 yard with a .223 is pretty impressive regardless of the projectile. the image shows plenty of tissue damage. this sort of performance certainly cast doubt over the old theory that a clean kill on...
Liked On: 07-02-2025, 11:32 AM
Hmm so what about the Targex projectiles? they seem to do very well across the board on deer sized targets? The targex is widely used in the target shooting and benchrest disciplines.
Liked On: 06-02-2025, 07:20 PM
I've used NV on fallow deer quite extensively with both 850 and 940 IR. the deer definitely see the 850, inside of 200m you risk spooking them, even when they don't spook you will see them looking...
Liked On: 06-02-2025, 07:13 PM
here's a couple of pics of what I mean. Here's a Zulus with and 850 Vcsel IR. So i attach a 940 the Pic Rail on the side 268371 Here's a Pard Night Stalker which has a 940 Vsel. So I have...
Liked On: 06-02-2025, 05:25 PM
I've used NV on fallow deer quite extensively with both 850 and 940 IR. the deer definitely see the 850, inside of 200m you risk spooking them, even when they don't spook you will see them looking...
Liked On: 06-02-2025, 09:15 AM
scanning for animals with a scope is a breach of rule 2 of the firearms safety code which says "always point your rifle in a safe direction." Not really a good idea for that reason alone.
Liked On: 03-02-2025, 07:44 AM
scanning for animals with a scope is a breach of rule 2 of the firearms safety code which says "always point your rifle in a safe direction." Not really a good idea for that reason alone.
Liked On: 02-02-2025, 07:42 PM
scanning for animals with a scope is a breach of rule 2 of the firearms safety code which says "always point your rifle in a safe direction." Not really a good idea for that reason alone.
Liked On: 31-01-2025, 09:43 PM
scanning for animals with a scope is a breach of rule 2 of the firearms safety code which says "always point your rifle in a safe direction." Not really a good idea for that reason alone.
Liked On: 28-01-2025, 10:14 AM
Hi All, I had a small whoopsee today and managed to put a ding in the housing on one of our Hakka TC12 mincers. This machine is brand new but of course I now cannot send it out to a retail store....
Liked On: 23-01-2025, 10:28 PM
SPF thanks
Liked On: 23-01-2025, 03:23 PM