I am not sure why there would be a argument, as the .270 can stand alone and is outstanding in any group of rifles :)
Type: Posts; User: Spook
I am not sure why there would be a argument, as the .270 can stand alone and is outstanding in any group of rifles :)
The MOA guarantee will be for the rifle, not the shooter...jam it in a vice and it will probably meet guarantee specifications.
Park the rifle up until your shoulder has healed as you wont be doing...
Oh sorry, I didn't realize that a poll had been taken. I would have thought the variation would have been greater than 50/50 in some form of breaking in.
The man has not been too good at taking...
28 rounds through it without any breaking in process, and you want it to be a target rifle?...jam it in the ground and use it for a tomato stake.
.
Tell him that under the CGA (or whatever it is called) that the rifle did not do what he claimed.
Just out of curiosity, what method of 'breaking in' did you use?
Oh dear...the rifle sold to you as the 'top of the line' yesterday will now be 'hard to sell piece of shit' today.
Because the .270 is not a long range rifle...beyond medium, but falls short as far as long range goes.
A .270 will beat the arse off a .308 any day of the week.
Why-o-why do people listen to salespeople, their job is to sell you something...you need to know all your information before you step into the shop...as for a .270 shooting 1000 metres...yeah sure,...