Yes, then I understood correctly. That is quantifying the total error.
I am not concerned about what Litz is saying. Me and Litz agree. The benchrest guy is likely writing about scope...
Type: Posts; User: Norway
Yes, then I understood correctly. That is quantifying the total error.
I am not concerned about what Litz is saying. Me and Litz agree. The benchrest guy is likely writing about scope...
A claw hammer ruptures the troll skull and the area require fluid sanitazion by public officials.
A blunt hammer implodes the troll brain without seepage and you can just leave them until daylight...
But you are doing exactly what I say in the film (?) - quantifying the total error.
Or did I misunderstand something? Are you identifying the exact error between the actual scope clicks and the...
Yeah, I just binned my Amax and bought ELD. You should all do the same! The recycling bin is just outside my house :D
But seriously, look at some of the new ELD bcs. The .30 225gr arrived...
You're not the only one. I'm typically 1 low/600 and 3 low/900. I just quantify it and then remove it. I don't know where the actual error is, but the trajectory is perfect after this.
How will I get the measuring tape perfectly level? A curve would change the measurement.
Fixed apparatus w/o shooting is the correct way. Not by shooting like internet says.
Camting errors shows up...
Litz is saying " you must measure things accurately for the test to work".
I am demonstrating what errors you bring into test as it is described.
The end result is that:
1) You can test...
Perhaps interesting. A film showing how a tall target test can be done, and it also explains why I don't really worry about it.
In my opinion, such a test provides more info about the shooter than...