Search:

Fuck Tussock, I didn't realise what a genius you were.

I didn't understand anything you said in that post, went right over my head with that one.

May as well have a 260. Same velocity for less powder burnt. Short barrel rifles are great, I have several, however there is no denying you lose velocity with them, I don't buy this shit about only...

Ok Gimp, you must have stumbled on a secret that no one else has ever discovered. I wonder why we all walk around with these long barrels then? We must all be stupid.

I dont agree with you on barrel length, I find it makes a big difference especially on 6.5's. Build yourself a short barreled 6.5x284 and see how it goes, they are fucken useless!

May explain early pressure signs tho.

Id say Normies barrel is getting on the short side to get those speeds from a 260, and as you know a longer barrel will get more velocity for the same pressure, so pressure and velocity are not...

Yes Gimp all of that sounds reasonable. Looks like Normies 42gr load may be a bit slower than 2644 tho unless something else is drastically wrong.
The load I use now in my 6.5x47 is only 41gr of...

If that load is doing 2500fps as the numbers would suggest its a bit of a lost cause really. Id try another power I think. If you'd like to grab the crony just let me know.

I agree that the G7 wont be that low, however it is something to look out for if you are running bullets slower or faster than their "usual" speeds. G7 is velocity dependent although not as bad as...

At 2644fps I doubt if the G7 bc will be working out at .299. Also whats your scope?