Theres another thread on here that outlines how this kind of thing can go all wrong. I suspect not all the facts have been reported but I have been following it with interest.
Type: Posts; User: Marty Henry
Theres another thread on here that outlines how this kind of thing can go all wrong. I suspect not all the facts have been reported but I have been following it with interest.
Hopefully it's a matter of interpretation, near is vague but endanger property etc, I think has been in a couple of cases has been interpreted as deliberately intending to damage, annoy or frighten....