There'd be a justification for both the 3.5-18x44 and the 2.4-12x50. The 2.4-12x50 is an inch shorter, has 29% more objective lens area and should have more depth of focus. As I understand it, side...
Type: Posts; User: PaulNZ
There'd be a justification for both the 3.5-18x44 and the 2.4-12x50. The 2.4-12x50 is an inch shorter, has 29% more objective lens area and should have more depth of focus. As I understand it, side...
I know it won't be for everyone, but when trying to decide on the importance of adjustable parallax for a given scope/application I found it useful to crunch the numbers:
Parallax Error =...