Marty Henry
Yes, looking at the other way, they did not know enough to justify NOT administering botulinum antitoxin.
Type: Posts; User: Cordite
Marty Henry
Yes, looking at the other way, they did not know enough to justify NOT administering botulinum antitoxin.
Link to article, which states 1080 was also tested for alongside botulinum toxin. Both negative. Creepy mention of a bowl of pork meal still appearing fresh after 35 days, everything else around it...
Well, there is more to the 1080 side than just settling public conspiracy theories:
If the tests done were negative for botulinum toxin, then ACC should not really decline cover for treatment...
As often, the heading and first line are contradictory. Illiterate journalists we shall always have with us, it seems:
Heading: "Police rule out deliberate poisoning in suspected botulism case"...
Thanks Maca49. That's profound. Yes, please know me as me, not as my illness.
Discussion in a forum is very much an exercise in brainstorming - resulting in good and bad ideas, and in criticisms of both. Nothing wrong with that.
It is a most curious case and the apparent...
Maca49 and vulcannz
Well, according to the impression gained by berg243 from his knowledgeable (doctor) sister, doctors are total retards because they occasionally write "L" when they were meant...
Yes, they'll go and break into the family's house and look through the kitchen herbs.
How to die from botulism:
Catch a fish, leave it on the ground and get soil into the gills. - still safe to eat
Boil it too short time, not killing off the anaerobic (hardy) spores. - still...
Taff
No, if taken internally.
Makes sense. If it was the pork it cannot be botulism. Botulinum toxin does not work that fast. Not sure what ingesting megadoses of it would do though, perhaps faster acting??? Don't know. ...
"The neighbours told me within 30 minutes of eating their meal they were throwing up at 15 minute intervals. Shibu rang 111 and fainted through the conversation."
Toxin-releasing bacteria and...