Tussock I agree with you and I also don't.
I always thought there was nothing wrong with it nor did several of my friends that shot them. I was always aware of the 3006 v 270 preference with several...
Type: Posts; User: csmiffy
Tussock I agree with you and I also don't.
I always thought there was nothing wrong with it nor did several of my friends that shot them. I was always aware of the 3006 v 270 preference with several...
It seems the 270 is caught up between bad performance from poor ammo 40+years ago (CAC forestry ammo did them no favours supposedly) and now everyone thinking that 350 yards is close enough to chuck...
if a 130-150 grain projectile nudging either side of 3000fps kicks in a standard weight rifle than the stock is less than optimal or the recoil pad is junk.
I know the 3006 can handle heavier...