I have found the 180 eldm to give far more consistent results at various ranges than the 162s and 168s of the above mentioned.
Type: Posts; User: Gkp
I have found the 180 eldm to give far more consistent results at various ranges than the 162s and 168s of the above mentioned.
Sweet as pic 5, 2970 fps. That's a good load, off hunting you go!
I assume that's the 162 eldm?
My vote goes to the 180 eldm. More predictable at closer ranges due to the extra mass, they don't tend to blow up at high speed like there lighter counterpart. Also less wind drift.
I believe the...